2001
DOI: 10.1007/s12132-001-0016-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The urban political ecology of water in Cape Town

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CoCT has, on the other hand, been criticised for taking a privatisation approach in its water management, where the fundamentals are focused on WDM, efficiency and the 'user pays on the marginal cost' principle (Smith, 2001;Smith and Hanson, 2003;Smith, 2004). More socially equitable pricing schemes are required as the current IBT system only appears to impact households living on the margin of comfort, while those with greater wealth adjust their consumption seasonally.…”
Section: Research Requiredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CoCT has, on the other hand, been criticised for taking a privatisation approach in its water management, where the fundamentals are focused on WDM, efficiency and the 'user pays on the marginal cost' principle (Smith, 2001;Smith and Hanson, 2003;Smith, 2004). More socially equitable pricing schemes are required as the current IBT system only appears to impact households living on the margin of comfort, while those with greater wealth adjust their consumption seasonally.…”
Section: Research Requiredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Smith (2001), nations (for example, South Africa) have utilized notions of distributive justice in adopting public policies that promise universal access to public services. A decade earlier, in considering social justice that promotes the equal distribution of consumer goods, Young (1990) (Young, 1990: 25).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Smith (2001) contrasts the public sector with private sector suppliers; he asserts that, unlike the public sector monopoly of water utilities that, ultimately, aims for universal access, private sector suppliers rely on a more narrow financial cost benefit analysis geared towards cost-recovery and maximising profit in a market setting. This approach, however, neglects the negative externalities that stem from excluding access to those who are unable to pay fees for water.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the quantity--25 litres per person per day--is half the amount of water recommended by the World Health Organisation and the RDP's medium term goal as necessary for meeting basic access (Smith and Hanson, 2003: 1530, Dor, Himlin and Ruiters, 2002. Therefore, FBW is criticised as "a very low minimum for water consumption..." (Smith andHanson, 2003: 1530) and thus not necessarily sufficient to address basic water needs.…”
Section: Fbw: Accessing Basic Needs Within a Cost-recovery Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%