1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-3358-6_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Uplift History of the Precambrian Crystalline Basement of the Jabal J’alan (Sur Area)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple mechanisms have been invoked to explain the Cenozoic exhumation and uplift in the Central Oman Mountains, including compression related to far‐field stresses of the Zagros collision (principally expressed in northern Oman) (Al‐Lazki et al, 2002; Mann et al, 1990; Mouthereau et al, 2012; Robertson & Searle, 1990) or a slowdown of Makran subduction to the east affecting central Oman (Hansmann et al, 2017). Low‐temperature thermochronometric data are broadly consistent with post‐obduction cooling below 100 °C regionally by ~40–30 Ma based on apatite fission track and (U‐Th)/He data ( Grobe et al, 2019 ; Hansman et al, 2017 ; Poupeau et al, 1998 ; Saddiqi et al, 2006; Würsten et al, ). For the purposes of this study, the timing of deformational events and regional cooling history are important context for interpreting the significance of the magnetite (U‐Th)/He data.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Multiple mechanisms have been invoked to explain the Cenozoic exhumation and uplift in the Central Oman Mountains, including compression related to far‐field stresses of the Zagros collision (principally expressed in northern Oman) (Al‐Lazki et al, 2002; Mann et al, 1990; Mouthereau et al, 2012; Robertson & Searle, 1990) or a slowdown of Makran subduction to the east affecting central Oman (Hansmann et al, 2017). Low‐temperature thermochronometric data are broadly consistent with post‐obduction cooling below 100 °C regionally by ~40–30 Ma based on apatite fission track and (U‐Th)/He data ( Grobe et al, 2019 ; Hansman et al, 2017 ; Poupeau et al, 1998 ; Saddiqi et al, 2006; Würsten et al, ). For the purposes of this study, the timing of deformational events and regional cooling history are important context for interpreting the significance of the magnetite (U‐Th)/He data.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Gray et al () report late Oligocene to early Miocene cooling, with rates increasing toward the north of the mountains. The only other published study in the Oman sector of the Al Hajar Mountains include three AFT ages ranging from 146 to 30 Ma from Jabal Ja'Alan (Würsten et al, ), at the eastern end of the range (Figure ). These ages were interpreted to indicate a period of burial, followed by Oligocene cooling.…”
Section: Previous Thermochronologic Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooling can also represent the dismembering of a previously acquired relief and therefore may be younger than the uplift event. Previous zircon and apatite fission track (ZFT and AFT) cooling ages have been interpreted to show either Miocene (Saddiqi et al, ) or Oligocene (Gray et al, ; Mount et al, ; Würsten et al, ) exhumation, cooling, and uplift of the Al Hajar Mountains. Most authors interpret this mountain uplift to be caused by far‐field stresses, originating from the Zagros collision (Ali et al, ; Fournier et al, ; Glennie et al, ; Nolan et al, ; Searle & Ali, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies post-mid Eocene uplift of the Oman Mountains to their current elevation (up to 3 km a.s.l). The precise timing and cause of the uplift is debated; suggestions for timing range from late Eocene to Oligocene (Würsten et al, 1991;Mount, Crawford and Bergman, 1998;Gray et al, 2006;Saddiqi et al, 2006;Hansman et al, 2017).…”
Section: Bandar Jissah Basin Northeastern Omanmentioning
confidence: 99%