International Handbook on Giftedness 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Unwanted Gifted and Talented: A Sociobiological Perspective of the Societal Functions of Giftedness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In gifted children displaying asynchronous development (advanced cognitive development while socioemotional development status is average), socioemotional development might be perceived by others as deficient due to a contrast effect (Baudson & Preckel, 2016). The negative stereotypes might also emerge and be relatively stable because believing in them might come with some advantages for most people: In societies in which cognitive ability is a highly valued characteristic, individuals with outstanding cognitive abilities might pose a threat to both the social statuses and the self-esteems of those who are less able (e.g., Persson, 2009). For the latter, it might be self-protective (and be perceived by them as only “fair”) if highly able persons would at least have problems in other areas to compensate for this perceived injustice (Baudson, 2016; Baudson & Preckel, 2016; Gallagher, 1990; Lerner, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In gifted children displaying asynchronous development (advanced cognitive development while socioemotional development status is average), socioemotional development might be perceived by others as deficient due to a contrast effect (Baudson & Preckel, 2016). The negative stereotypes might also emerge and be relatively stable because believing in them might come with some advantages for most people: In societies in which cognitive ability is a highly valued characteristic, individuals with outstanding cognitive abilities might pose a threat to both the social statuses and the self-esteems of those who are less able (e.g., Persson, 2009). For the latter, it might be self-protective (and be perceived by them as only “fair”) if highly able persons would at least have problems in other areas to compensate for this perceived injustice (Baudson, 2016; Baudson & Preckel, 2016; Gallagher, 1990; Lerner, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One student finished too quickly, but was made to erase all the answers just to finish together with the rest of the class, a completely unreasonable measure for a teacher to take. This behavior, on the other hand, may be understood on sociobiological grounds as a simple threat not so much to the order in a classroom, but a threat to the teacher's self-esteem and position of authority (Persson, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'law' is especially strong with regard to intellectual achievements. In a seeming contradiction, there is no problem with the acceptance of exceptional achievements in sports or the arts [33], however offering provisions for the academically gifted in the education system has been a no-go area for many years. Persson proposes a political explanation for this situation in his native Sweden.…”
Section: Scandinavian Approaches To Talent Development and Excellencementioning
confidence: 99%