1976
DOI: 10.1243/pime_proc_1976_190_031_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Unsteady Boundary Layer in a Shock Tube

Abstract: SYNOPSIS The unsteady boundary layer behind a moving shock wave in a rectangular duct 7.62 cm wide × 5.08 cm high has been studied using a high quality schlieren system. Growth of the boundary layer has been compared with the results of calculations for laminar and turbulent flows. The experimental results indicate that three dimensional effects are present which cause, in some cases, very early transition from laminar to turbulent flow. Agreement with theory is satisfactory only in the case of the weakest sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is now considerable evidence for the presence of organized structures in supersonic flows. For example, Head & Bandyopadhyay (1981) found support for their hairpin vortex hypothesis from the schlieren photographs of Deckker & Weekes (1976) and Deckker (1980) in supersonic boundary layers. While the photographs do not contain incontrovertible evidence of hairpin vortices, the boundary layers are shown to contain coherent density structures inclined at about 45" to the wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…There is now considerable evidence for the presence of organized structures in supersonic flows. For example, Head & Bandyopadhyay (1981) found support for their hairpin vortex hypothesis from the schlieren photographs of Deckker & Weekes (1976) and Deckker (1980) in supersonic boundary layers. While the photographs do not contain incontrovertible evidence of hairpin vortices, the boundary layers are shown to contain coherent density structures inclined at about 45" to the wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…More direct evidence in favour of the hairpin-vortex hypothesis comes from the experiments of Prof. Deckker, where the focused schlieren technique was used in a rectangular duct, to make visible the growth of the boundary layer following the passage of a shock. The paper by Deckker & Weekes (1976) shows spark photographs of the flow on the floor of the duct for two different strengths of shock wave, with different time intervals following the passage of the shock. Where the boundary layer is turbulent, as in the photographs reproduced here as figures 41 (a, b ) , quite marked and regular striations are visible in the flow close to the wall.…”
Section: Additional Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some evidence also exists for the presence of coherent motions in supersonic flows. For example, the schlieren photographs of Deckker & Weekes (1976) and Deckker (1980) show the floor of a duct after the passage of a shock wave (see Head & Bandyopadhyay 1981). For two different shock strengths, 45" striations were visible close to the wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%