1972
DOI: 10.2307/2063973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
217
0
7

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
217
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings reflect other studies on peer intervening that describes intervening with close friends and where there is greater perceived risk of harm [ 10 ]. This is also shown with bullying and violence [ 31 ] and indeed, it is consistent with the classic bystander intervention model of Latané and Darley [ 32 ] who suggest a feeling of responsibility and identified danger are key steps in intervening. However, other studies have found that some adolescents aren’t always willing to intervene with some describing it as, ‘none of their business’ [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The findings reflect other studies on peer intervening that describes intervening with close friends and where there is greater perceived risk of harm [ 10 ]. This is also shown with bullying and violence [ 31 ] and indeed, it is consistent with the classic bystander intervention model of Latané and Darley [ 32 ] who suggest a feeling of responsibility and identified danger are key steps in intervening. However, other studies have found that some adolescents aren’t always willing to intervene with some describing it as, ‘none of their business’ [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Identifying PWD is not enough to motivate intervention; witnesses must take responsibility for their actions [ 79 ]. However, multiple witnesses may lead witnesses to assume that their help is not needed and make them feel less responsible (diffusion of responsibility [ 83 ]). Witnesses may also attribute responsibility for their intervention to the victim’s colleagues or other members of the group [ 84 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, behaviors with low immediacy and involvement occur when bystanders later support the victim, for example, by privately encouraging the victim to report the incident. Training could take into account the phenomenon of audience inhibition, which is the concern witnesses have about what others will think of them if they act [ 83 ]. Male witnesses, for example, might believe that their intervention (to protect the victim or prevent the perpetrator) will result in a loss of social status if norms of loyalty to members of their own group stand in the way of intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"A Bystander is considered to be a person who does not become actively involved in a situation where someone else requires help. In the literature, the concept of the bystander is consistently applied to describe the behavior of people in emergencies such as the Kitty Genovese murder, where several people witnessed a violent assault without any effective intervention (Latané & Darley, 1970). Where one or more people are in danger, Bystanders therefore could, by taking some form of action, affect the outcome of the situation even if they were not able to avert it.…”
Section: What Berne Wrotementioning
confidence: 99%