Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1990
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4807104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The unpredictability of impacted third molar development--the danger of passive observation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cone beam computed tomography is considered as the desirable tool for detecting subtle changes, such as ERR because it helps in assessing the region of interest in all the planes and has relatively less amount of radiation when compared with CT scans. 27 Most of the available data on ERR have come from case reports [28][29][30] and retrospective studies of panoramic and periapical radiographs, 11,17,27,[31][32][33][34] and very few studies have been performed comparing panoramic imaging with CBCT, and the information available is still limited. Taking into consideration the importance of diagnosis of ERR radiographically, the study aimed to compare panoramic radiography and CBCT for determining ERR of second molars.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cone beam computed tomography is considered as the desirable tool for detecting subtle changes, such as ERR because it helps in assessing the region of interest in all the planes and has relatively less amount of radiation when compared with CT scans. 27 Most of the available data on ERR have come from case reports [28][29][30] and retrospective studies of panoramic and periapical radiographs, 11,17,27,[31][32][33][34] and very few studies have been performed comparing panoramic imaging with CBCT, and the information available is still limited. Taking into consideration the importance of diagnosis of ERR radiographically, the study aimed to compare panoramic radiography and CBCT for determining ERR of second molars.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…É preconizado na literatura específica de cirurgia bucomaxilofacial que para o planejamento cirúrgico dos dentes não irrompidos, seja realizada uma radiografia panorâmica 10,25,49,50,53,65 .…”
Section: -Introduçãounclassified