The United States’ China Containment Strategy and the South China Sea Dispute

Abstract

The common contention regarding the South China Sea is that its characteristic assets are the central or even the sole explanation for the debate. However, it is the argument of this study that this view is distorted and perilously deceptive. This study argues that there are multiple explanations for these territorial disputes and that they are significantly complicated by the proximity of a few players, the ascent of powerful new forces, the impact of financial power, the dispersion of military and political power, and geopolitical rivalry in Asia. The Unites States views China as a threat to its global hegemony and so has a policy of ‘containment’. In the context of the South China Sea, its policies therefore are not intended to resolve disputes in a mutually beneficial way, but to limit China’s influence. This forces countries to ‘choose sides’ rather than engage in mutually beneficial trade. The policy has now also led to a trade war, which could escalate into a military confrontation. This investigation examines the progression of this debate by taking into consideration the various geostrategic, geo-economics, and geopolitical interests of the parties involved and suggests a fundamental paradigm shift in the direction of research to be more conducive toward finding a realistic and peaceful resolution to the disputes in the South China Sea.

Economic Relations Between China and Asean: The Shadow of the South China Sea Issue

“…The prospect of ASEAN becoming more divided over the issue is a real possibility, due to divergent views and China's influence within the association (De Castro, 2020). The region witnessed a paradigm shift in research towards finding a realistic and peaceful resolution to the disputes (Teixeira, 2019). The complexity of the SCS issues poses challenges to regionalism in Southeast Asia.…”

The Hegemony’s Contest in the South China Sea

“…Meanwhile, the United States seeks to exercise a containment strategy based on two pillars to preserve the status quo. As Teixeira (2019) notes, “Geopolitically, containing China reduces her to the status of a regional power. Geo-strategically, containing China ensures the continuing dominance of the American hegemony” (p. 174).…”

US rebalance strategy to Asia and US-China rivalry in South China Sea from the perspective of the offensive realism

“…It has become a status quo power because it finally embraced the liberal values, as well as there are many factors support peace of China’s rise such as its non-imperial history and the peacefulness of the Confucian teachings. On the other hand, the offensive realists maintain that China’s rise would be not peaceful because of it a revisionist power (Teixeira, 2018, pp. 25-26).…”