The United States All-Volunteer Force: Emerging (And Often Unanticipated) Issues of Recruitment, Retention, and Readiness

Abstract

Povzetek Po drugi svetovni vojni so se oborožene sile ZDA popolnjevale z vpoklicem ali obveznim služenjem vojaškega roka za fante. Ta praksa se je končala leta 1973 z uvedbo prostovoljnega popolnjevanja (All-Volunteer Force – AVF). Uvedba AVF pa je prinesla več novih izzivov, vključno z ustreznim pridobivanjem in zadrževanjem vojaškega kadra. Sčasoma je bilo treba sprejeti več prosilcev, saj se je pridobivanje kadra zmanjšalo. Bilo je manj zainteresiranih in ustreznih prosilcev, od teh pa še manj tistih, ki so ustrezali standardom. Ob uvedbi sprememb v nacionalni obrambni politiki in zaradi sodelovanja ZDA v nedavnih bojnih operacijah večjega obsega je prišlo do pomanjkanja pripravljenosti na področju pridobivanja in zadrževanja kadra. Nezadovoljiva pripravljenost se je najbolj kazala v rezervni sestavi, na kar se v tem članku tudi osredotočamo. S pomočjo opisa teh dogodkov prikazujemo medsebojno povezanost med pridobivanjem in zadrževanjem kadra ter pripravljenostjo, pri čemer kažemo na potrebo po bolj preudarnem razmisleku o tem, kako se vsak izmed njih izvaja, še zlasti v okviru AVF. Teorija identitete ponuja načine za razumevanje in razvijanje takih vrst vojaškega kadra, ki je potreben za lažje pridobivanje, zadrževanje in pripravo kadra. Ključne besede: vpoklic, obvezno služenje vojaškega roka, prostovoljno popolnjevanje, All-Volunteer Force – AVF, pridobivanje kadra, zadrževanje kadra, pripravljenost. Abstract After World War II “the draft”, or compulsory military service of young men, staffed U.S. forces. This practice ended in 1973 with the introduction of the All-Volunteer Force (AVF). However, staffing the AVF introduced several new challenges, including the adequate recruitment and retention of military personnel. Over time, more applicants had to be taken, as recruitment fell short. There were fewer interested and eligible applicants, and of these, even fewer who met the standards. A lack of readiness relating to both recruitment and retention became apparent as changes occurred in the national defense policy and the U.S.’s participation in recent large-scale combat operations. Inadequacies in readiness were most evident among the reserve forces – the focus of this paper. Through the description of these events, the inter-relationships between recruitment, retention, and readiness are demonstrated, pointing to the need for more deliberate thought with regard to how each is implemented, especially in the context of the AVF. Identity theory offers ways to understand and to develop the kinds of military personnel needed to better recruit, retain, and ready personnel. KEY WORDS draft, compulsory military service, all-volunteer force, recruitment, retention, readiness

Reserve Military Service: A Social Constructionist Perspective

“…2, 2010). Changing demands on reservists have prompted research in a number of areas such as their experiences (Griffith, 2011a;Hoge et al, 2006;Thomas et al, 2010), recruitment (Griffith, 2018), retention (Perry et al, 1991), and readiness for deployment (General Accounting Office, 1992). A related set of issues has been the differences between reservists and full-time military personnel, as well as the tensions marking their interrelationship (Gazit et al, 2020;Kirke, 2008).…”

“…While scholars have characterized reservists using such images as transmigrants, moonlighters, weekend warriors, or part-timers, what is still lacking is an integrative summary that not only summarizes findings but illuminates their implications for reserve service. This synthesis is all the more important, given the significant diversity among reservists in terms of the kind of motivations driving them to join and be retained (Griffith, 2018), with some individuals joining to take up a job different from their civilian one (Neuhaus & Crompvoets, 2013;Weitz, 2007) and others seeing reserve duty as a break or diversion from civilian life or a place to renew connections with buddies (Bury, 2019a(Bury, , 2019bEtzion et al, 1998;Lording, 2013). Moreover, as deployment may lower the income of many individuals (Griffith, 2018), Lording (2013) suggests that the motivations of the reservists she studied combined considerations of both volunteering and income-seeking.…”