The United Kingdom after brexit

Ananieva, Elena; Babynina, Lyudmila; Энтин, Марк; Galushko, Dmitriy V.; Godovanyuk, Kira; Kuznetsov, A. N.; McHutchon, David; Ostapenko, Galina; Okhoshin, Oleg; Podkolzina, I.; Polyakova, Elena; Sillars, Jim; Суслопарова, Е.А.; Shein, Sergey A.; Shkrobtak, Igor

doi:10.15211/report82021_386

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

(2 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…В Венгрии премьер-министру В. Орбану удалось поставить ситуацию под контроль, что повысило его политический рейтинг. Страна стала наиболее обеспеченной вакцинами из всех стран ЕС за счёт принципиального решения о вариативности вакцин посредством договорённостей Венгрии с Россией и Китаем 3 .…”

Section: старые и новые проблемыunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Society and politics in the «COVID-19 era»

Ananieva¹,

Vodopianova²,

Гуселетов³

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a collective monograph authors explore problems of European social and political life connected with the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020–2022. Issues of civil society, system of higher education and religious institutes are examined. Chapters of the book touch upon internal political situation in the majority of European countries and regions such as Great Britain, France, Sweden, Greece, Norway, South-Eastern Europe. Authors come to a conclusion that COVID-19 highlighted problems in medical, social and economic spheres of the majority of European countries and unpreparedness of political structures to tackle the multi-faceted threat of the global pandemic.

show abstract

Section: старые и новые проблемыunclassified

“…139-146. DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran62021139146 3 Шишелина Л.Н. Опыт Вишеградских стран в борьбе с пандемией // Научноаналитический вестник ИЕ РАН.…”

Section: старые и новые проблемыunclassified

Society and politics in the «COVID-19 era»

Ananieva¹,

Vodopianova²,

Гуселетов³

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Factor of Australia in British Foreign Policy

Godovanyuk

2022

Her. Russ. Acad. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Australian component of UK foreign policy in the context of the changing world order is outlined. It is highlighted that, in a value and ideological sense and due to the common Anglo-Saxon identity, London assigns Canberra a key role in the coalition of like-minded countries (“network of liberty”); in geostrategic terms, it perceives Australia as a platform to expand the UK influence in the Indo-Pacific. At present, the “special” partnership between the two countries is underpinned by a number of new agreements, including a “historical” trade deal aimed at strengthening economic ties and in-depth political, diplomatic, and defense cooperation, based on a new military alliance, AUKUS. At the same time, the traditional pragmatism inherent in the foreign policy of Australia, which positions itself as a reliable international actor, is being replaced by increasing military–political and economic dependence, which plays into the hands of London. Coming closer with Australia also allows Britain to present itself as the key extraregional player in the system of anti-Chinese alliances in the Indo-Pacific, with Washington and Canberra in the forefront.

show abstract

Problems of Legal Regulation of Financial Services in the Context of Brexit

Galushko

2022

Russian Journal of Legal Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The financial services sector is an important contributor to the United Kingdoms (UKs) economy. The article discusses the main problems that arose in this sector as a result of Brexit. The European Union (EU)-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement that was concluded as a result of Brexit does not contain special rules regarding financial services, thereby adding risks to the financial stability of the parties, while the existing international acts of soft law do not fill the existing gap. Consequently, the access of British financial services to the EU Common Market is possible only on the basis of recognition of the equivalence of the British regulatory regime to that of the EU. Meanwhile, such a decision has not yet been made and is unlikely to be made in the near future. Equivalence promotes the convergence of the two legal orders, providing a reduced uncertainty in the regulation of financial services. It was concluded that in the context of the goals of the UKs withdrawal from the EU and the intentions of the British government to return regulatory powers, the lack of a clear international legal mechanism for cooperation between the UK and EU in the field of financial services regulation will contribute to increasing divergence in legal regulation within both legal orders. This may also increase barriers to cross-border trade in financial services. The methodological bases of the work were the well-known general and particular methods of scientific research. The article aimed to study the relevant problems of legal regulation of financial services in the context of the UKs withdrawal from the EU, and identify general trends as well as the essential characteristics and main features in the field.

show abstract

The United Kingdom after brexit

Cited by 4 publications

References 1 publication

Society and politics in the «COVID-19 era»

Society and politics in the «COVID-19 era»

The Factor of Australia in British Foreign Policy

Problems of Legal Regulation of Financial Services in the Context of Brexit

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About