1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02427968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Unitary Association Method of Relative Dating and Its Application to Archaeological Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, estimates of storage capacity should be standardised to the size of the sample, or the excavated volume (cf. Blackham 1997), which would be difficult in this case. But total excavated areas are very similar, measuring about 4500 sq.…”
Section: Storage and Other Featuresmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Ideally, estimates of storage capacity should be standardised to the size of the sample, or the excavated volume (cf. Blackham 1997), which would be difficult in this case. But total excavated areas are very similar, measuring about 4500 sq.…”
Section: Storage and Other Featuresmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Several approaches have been developed that seek ordinations with the greatest possible level of agreement among the observed patterns of species co‐occurrences (Guex 1991, 2011; Alroy 1994, 2000; Blackham 1998; Puolamäki et al. 2006; Galster et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%