1993
DOI: 10.1002/ca.980060409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The uniform anatomical gift act: What every clinical anatomist should know

Abstract: Although many are aware of the existence of a document called the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA), few are aware that there are actually two such Acts (1968 and 1987), and even fewer have read the Acts themselves. Consequently, there are many different and frequently false impressions about their purpose and content. This paper is an attempt to acquaint readers with the two UAGAs. The historical background leading to the unprecedented rapid, uniform and unanimous adoption of the 1968 Act is presented. The c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This access to cadavers may be envied by some countries (e.g., Australia) which have experienced difficulty in acquisition (Parker, 2002;Nayak, 2004). There are other countries such as the USA which have successful body donor programs (UAGA, 1968;Dalley et al, 1993) and no problems in acquiring cadavers (e.g., Thailand); (Winkelman and Gü ldner, 2004). Recent concerns about the health hazard posed by formalin and the shortage of staff have also made many institutions reconsider the use of dissection (Nayak, 2004;Parker, 2002), as has the problem of HIV/AIDS (Asala et al, 1997;Ihunwo, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This access to cadavers may be envied by some countries (e.g., Australia) which have experienced difficulty in acquisition (Parker, 2002;Nayak, 2004). There are other countries such as the USA which have successful body donor programs (UAGA, 1968;Dalley et al, 1993) and no problems in acquiring cadavers (e.g., Thailand); (Winkelman and Gü ldner, 2004). Recent concerns about the health hazard posed by formalin and the shortage of staff have also made many institutions reconsider the use of dissection (Nayak, 2004;Parker, 2002), as has the problem of HIV/AIDS (Asala et al, 1997;Ihunwo, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 1968, medical schools in the United States have relied increasingly upon bequested bodies rather than unclaimed bodies for dissection (see Dalley et al, 1993;Jones, 1994). Therefore, even if some of the bodies are unclaimed, "donor" can be used in the laboratory for the sake of uniformity, even though this term is not technically accurate.…”
Section: Compassion In the Laboratory Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unethical welfare authorities, instead of relinquishing unclaimed bodies to medical schools, entered into profitable arrangements with undertakers or cemeteries (Dalley et al, 1993). This both bestowed commercial value upon the dead body, and precipitated the need for bequest laws.…”
Section: From Grave Robbing and Murder To Unclaimed Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%