2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2011.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “unfriending” problem: The consequences of homophily in friendship retention for causal estimates of social influence

Abstract: An increasing number of scholars are using longitudinal social network data to try to obtain estimates of peer or social influence effects. These data may provide additional statistical leverage, but they can introduce new inferential problems. In particular, while the confounding effects of homophily in friendship formation are widely appreciated, homophily in friendship retention may also confound causal estimates of social influence in longitudinal network data. We provide evidence for this claim in a Monte… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, by introducing lagged obesity variables, it only partly takes into account the problem of selection that may occur as obese individuals may have a higher probability to become friends (for details see pages 217-218 in Shalizi and Thomas, 2011). Finally, by focusing on dyads over time, it introduces an upward bias resulting from the unfriending problem as defined by Noel and Nyhan (2011). 9 The basic idea behind this argument is that people who are alike (homophilious) are more likely to maintain social ties.…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, by introducing lagged obesity variables, it only partly takes into account the problem of selection that may occur as obese individuals may have a higher probability to become friends (for details see pages 217-218 in Shalizi and Thomas, 2011). Finally, by focusing on dyads over time, it introduces an upward bias resulting from the unfriending problem as defined by Noel and Nyhan (2011). 9 The basic idea behind this argument is that people who are alike (homophilious) are more likely to maintain social ties.…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, being part of a social group where other members recently gained weight has been related to an individual's adoption of obesity-related peer behaviors (Eisenberg and Quinn 2006) and likelihood of obesity (Christakis and Fowler 2007). However, much controversy remains regarding the causal nature of these associations Sainsbury 2008;Lyons 2011;Noel and Nyhan 2011;Shalizi and Thomas 2011).…”
Section: Social Factors Which Influence Nutrition Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular challenge to such research is to take into account the demographic composition of the social networks. Adolescents' friends are not chosen at random: an adolescent is more likely to befriend other adolescents of the same gender, socioeconomic status, and, relevant to the present study, migration or ethnicity, a pattern known as "homophily" (McPherson et al, 2001;Noel & Nyhan, 2011;Rivera et al, 2010). Homophily has been defined as "a tendency for friendships to form between those who are alike in some designated respect" (Rivera et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%