1983
DOI: 10.1090/pspum/040.1/713063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The unfolding and determinacy theorems for subgroups of 𝒜 and 𝒦

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
160
0
6

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
160
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These subgroups G q of G fail to be geometric subgroups of A and K in the sense of Damon [11,12], hence the usual determinacy and unfolding theorems do not hold for G q . In this situation moduli and even functional moduli often appear already in codimension zero, and, e.g., for R n this is indeed the case: a Morse function has a functional modulus (and hence infinite modality) in the volume preserving case [49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These subgroups G q of G fail to be geometric subgroups of A and K in the sense of Damon [11,12], hence the usual determinacy and unfolding theorems do not hold for G q . In this situation moduli and even functional moduli often appear already in codimension zero, and, e.g., for R n this is indeed the case: a Morse function has a functional modulus (and hence infinite modality) in the volume preserving case [49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Damon showed that these results are also valid for a larger class of subgroups of K and A, which he called geometric subgroups of K and A ( [7]). These are subgroups that satisfy some algebraic properties that ensure that all the results on finite determinacy and versal unfoldings are valid for the action of such subgroups on m n · E(n, p).…”
Section: Definition 23 ([1]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can then classify germs of functions in m 3 up to A * = G × L-equivalence. However, the group A * is not a Damon geometric subgroup [7], so the classification is in the formal category. (Basically, we show that there exists an integer k such that m l…”
Section: Formal Classification Of Pairs (ω η)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some relevant concepts that we do not state can be found in Ref. [6]. {(R x,y,λ,α , J x,y,λ,α )} ≡ {(ε α , μ α ), (ε λ,α (Δ), μ α ε λ,α (Δ)), (ε y,λ,α (Γ, Δ), μ α ε y,λ,α (Γ, Δ)), (ε x,y,λ,α (Γ, Δ), μ α ε x,y,λ,α (Γ, Δ))} , which is a system of DA-algebras and Jacobson ideals.…”
Section: Definition 22 a Bifurcation Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%