2018
DOI: 10.1089/vim.2017.0138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Unexpected Impact of Vaccines on Secondary Bacterial Infections Following Influenza

Abstract: Influenza virus infections remain a significant health burden worldwide, despite available vaccines. Factors that contribute to this include a lack of broad coverage by current vaccines and continual emergence of novel virus strains. Further complicating matters, when influenza viruses infect a host, severe infections can develop when bacterial pathogens invade. Secondary bacterial infections (SBIs) contribute to a significant proportion of influenza-related mortality, with Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphyloco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 263 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The models assume all individuals in the population have identical immunity generated by exposure to influenza in the past. They will also need to taking into account the prior immune history to influenza infection that may lead to mild and/or asymptomatic infections, mild infection as a result of the vaccination and effect of influenza vaccine on secondary bacterial infections [ 58 61 ]. Finally, we have assumed that there is no inherent fitness difference in the two strains (in the absence of immunity) and need to consider the process of generation of variation and how vaccination can change the tempo of antigenic evolution which has been considered in a recent paper [ 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models assume all individuals in the population have identical immunity generated by exposure to influenza in the past. They will also need to taking into account the prior immune history to influenza infection that may lead to mild and/or asymptomatic infections, mild infection as a result of the vaccination and effect of influenza vaccine on secondary bacterial infections [ 58 61 ]. Finally, we have assumed that there is no inherent fitness difference in the two strains (in the absence of immunity) and need to consider the process of generation of variation and how vaccination can change the tempo of antigenic evolution which has been considered in a recent paper [ 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout influenza virus infection, epithelial cells are infected and die, and inflammation accumulates as host immune responses work to halt virus spread. As lung tissue becomes injured and the host immune response weakens, bacterial pathogens readily invade and cause pneumonia . Heightened lethality occurs when bacteria invade during the virus resolution phase with the maximum synergistic effect at 7 days post‐influenza …”
Section: Influenza‐bacteria Coinfection Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As lung tissue becomes injured and the host immune response weakens, bacterial pathogens readily invade and cause pneumonia. 3,4,[6][7][8][9][10]124 Heightened lethality occurs when bacteria invade during the virus resolution phase with the maximum synergistic effect at 7 days post-influenza. 112 Following bacterial infection, viral loads rebound and bacterial titers increase to high levels within ~24 hours (Figure 4).…”
Section: Host-pathogen Regulation During Influenzapneumococcal Coinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discovery of antibiotics and the development of influenza and bacterial vaccines have significantly reduced the chances of recurrence of catastrophic pandemics like the Spanish influenza of 1918 [102]. However, influenza and other respiratory viruses remain among the main causes of bacterial complications and of CAP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%