2016
DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Underlying Mechanism of Preventing Facial Nerve Stimulation by Triphasic Pulse Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users Assessed With Objective Measure

Abstract: Triphasic pulse stimulation prevents from FNS because of a smaller gradient of EMG input-output function compared with biphasic pulse stimulation. The underlying mechanism can be modeled by differences in spatiotemporal spread of the electrical field.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
30
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…FNS was either completely or partially eliminated during this study using various programming techniques during fitting, such as deactivating channels, changing the phase duration, changing the coding strategy, or using triphasic pulses. Previous studies have reported good results with the use of triphasic pulses instead of biphasic pulses, 2,15–17 and they proved effective in our study for reducing FNS, particularly for higher‐grade FNS. Triphasic pulses reduce the effects of FNS by distributing the charge across two negative phases of the same duration and one positive phase with a double duration time 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FNS was either completely or partially eliminated during this study using various programming techniques during fitting, such as deactivating channels, changing the phase duration, changing the coding strategy, or using triphasic pulses. Previous studies have reported good results with the use of triphasic pulses instead of biphasic pulses, 2,15–17 and they proved effective in our study for reducing FNS, particularly for higher‐grade FNS. Triphasic pulses reduce the effects of FNS by distributing the charge across two negative phases of the same duration and one positive phase with a double duration time 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Several methods have been applied to reduce the effects of FNS. These include changing the mapping program, turning off the electrode contacts that are causing FNS, changing the current levels, or using triphasic pulses instead of biphasic pulses 2,15–17 . However, these strategies can sometimes result in a less than ideal fitting map for the CI recipient 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper limit of electric stimulation was in most mice determined by the presence of a facial nerve response. Facial nerve stimulation is one of the most well-known and most frequent complications in the cochlear implantation procedure 24 . It is therefore of high clinical relevance to try to minimize it.…”
Section: Ramped Shapes Have Steeper Eabr Growth Function Slopes Compamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the idea of targeting certain neuronal networks, strategies have been proposed in electrical stimulation of neuronal networks for cochlear implants, auditory brain stem implants, auditory mid brain implants, as well as for deep brain stimulation (Bahmer et al, 2009 ; Bahmer, 2016 , 2017 ; Bahmer and Schleich, 2016 ). These stimulation strategies and alternative pulse shapes (Bahmer et al, 2010 ; Bahmer and Baumann, 2016 ) may also be useful for the deep brain stimulation in psychiatric diseases (Buzsáki and Watson, 2012 ).…”
Section: Oscillations As a Target For Brain-computer-interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%