2001
DOI: 10.5465/3069409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Uncertain Relevance of Newness: Organizational Learning and Knowledge Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
78
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, when the technological knowledge of the firm exceeds the requirements of its strategic implementation or the level of major competitors, exploring new technological knowledge becomes financially and operationally inefficient (March, 1991). Therefore, the firm should focus on exploiting and refining its existing knowledge for certain and immediate returns (Schulz, 2001;Zack, 1999). Likewise, customer or competitor orientations may reflect similar (or different) patterns when they drive knowledge exploitation/exploration.…”
Section: How Does So Matter?mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In contrast, when the technological knowledge of the firm exceeds the requirements of its strategic implementation or the level of major competitors, exploring new technological knowledge becomes financially and operationally inefficient (March, 1991). Therefore, the firm should focus on exploiting and refining its existing knowledge for certain and immediate returns (Schulz, 2001;Zack, 1999). Likewise, customer or competitor orientations may reflect similar (or different) patterns when they drive knowledge exploitation/exploration.…”
Section: How Does So Matter?mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Schulz (2001) also proposes that HKFs primarily occur between related and adjacent subsidiaries, implying that the control that HQ has over the HKF is constrained. Based on the above arguments, we can claim that HQ would have a higher level of mandate on the VKF than on the HKF.…”
Section: The Mia Of Mnc and Horizontal Knowledge Inflows To Subsidiariesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To extend this line of research, this study instead seeks to examine the contingency value of social capital (Burt 1997 ties and knowledge search. The base-line expectation for our contingency explanations, consistent with the basic tenets of social capital theory, is that when working in the foreign subsidiary, executives as boundary spanners (Schulz 2001) cultivate and build social contacts outside their subsidiaries for a purpose. The external ties serve as useful sources that can add to executives' knowledge stock and constitute the informal advice network from which executives seek information to resolve encountered problems (Nebus 2006).…”
Section: Social Ties and Knowledge Search Tendencymentioning
confidence: 66%