2001
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.267874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Unbearable Rightness of Bush v. Gore

Abstract: for helpful comments, and to the Law & Economics Center at George Mason Law School for generous financial support. I am especially grateful to Stephen G. Gilles for his relentlessly skeptical and constructive criticisms of several preliminary drafts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the decision in Bush v. Gore did not seem to further those values. (Balkin, 2001: 1408-9, FN 18)Again, there were numerous critics and supporters (see for example: Balkin, 2001; Chemnennsky, 2000–01; Goldman, 2002; Klarman, 2001; Kritzer, 2001; Lund, 2002; McConnell, 2001; Nicholson and Howard, 2003). It is quite revealing that the critics could not simply draw on formal legal criteria, but instead were compelled to delve into values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the decision in Bush v. Gore did not seem to further those values. (Balkin, 2001: 1408-9, FN 18)Again, there were numerous critics and supporters (see for example: Balkin, 2001; Chemnennsky, 2000–01; Goldman, 2002; Klarman, 2001; Kritzer, 2001; Lund, 2002; McConnell, 2001; Nicholson and Howard, 2003). It is quite revealing that the critics could not simply draw on formal legal criteria, but instead were compelled to delve into values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%