1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0361-3682(96)00039-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Unbearable Ambiguity of Accounting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, because it is not possible to create a classification system that can prescribe accounting treatments for all potential transactions (McSweeney 1997;Mouck, 2004) this 'danger at the margin' is further exaggerated as it provides managers with the option of adopting accounting treatments that suit their purposes and yet technically still remain within the rules. The boundary between adopting an accounting treatment that is within the spirit of an accounting standard and adopting an accounting treatment that is technically within the rules but has been chosen to achieve a desired outcome is ill defined as evidenced by Enron's manipulation of earnings using mark to market accounting and Special Purpose Entities (Baker and Hayes, 2004).…”
Section: Accounting Auditing and The Issue Of Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, because it is not possible to create a classification system that can prescribe accounting treatments for all potential transactions (McSweeney 1997;Mouck, 2004) this 'danger at the margin' is further exaggerated as it provides managers with the option of adopting accounting treatments that suit their purposes and yet technically still remain within the rules. The boundary between adopting an accounting treatment that is within the spirit of an accounting standard and adopting an accounting treatment that is technically within the rules but has been chosen to achieve a desired outcome is ill defined as evidenced by Enron's manipulation of earnings using mark to market accounting and Special Purpose Entities (Baker and Hayes, 2004).…”
Section: Accounting Auditing and The Issue Of Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But at the same time, accounting is said to be unbearably imprisoned with ( both technical and conceptual ambiguities and inadequacies e.g. Boland & Pondy, 1983;March, 1987;Hopwood, 1990;Power, 1992;Ezzamel, ) 1994;Carruthers, 1995;Miller, 1996;McSweeney, 1997 . Not only does ( ) ambiguity surround the term '' value' ' Tinker, 1985 but there is also lack of ''any coherent and durable technical definitions of assets, liabilities, profit, loss, revenue, function of the balance sheet, audit, auditor ( ) independence and other basics' ' Mitchell & Sikka, 1993, p. 49 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 1980 and Tom Lee's ( ) ( ) Cash Flow Accounting 1984, McSweeney 1997 , contrasts the ''ideal of non-arbitrary representation'' which both the texts he studied privilege, '' with the mode of attempted realisation''. His analysis shows that accounting representations have limits that make the possibility of an unambiguous accounting unattainable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference to the ideal of representational faithfulness in order to condone such 'new' or 'modern' accounting seems to largely under-estimate the complex and contestable environment in which elected councils exist and does not, in spite of good intentions, reflect the underlying commercial substance of activities within present day local government. Moreover, the (mis)representation of community assets as monetary resources within statements of financial position of local governments is a spur to intervention (Hacking 1983:31;McSweeney 1997). It miscategorises the resources and, at the same time, makes them 'unstable' while the underlying quest for 'objectivity', within local government financial reporting, remains disconnected from prevailing organisational and social contexts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of 'objectivity' and its pursuit holds appeal in accounting which can be represented as a means of reducing instability, diversity and randomness in financial reporting. McSweeney (1997) investigated this notion in specifically evaluating 'the ideal of representational faithfulness' in financial reporting. According to McSweeney, 'the ideal of representational faithfulness [in financial reporting] functions regulatively' (McSweeney 1997:706) but it may also be constructed as 'an unattainable state' even though the pursuit of ideals 'can be perfectly real and eminently productive' (Rescher 1993:138).…”
Section: 'A Regulatory Ideal' As a Potential Defencementioning
confidence: 99%