The (un)intended outcome of public sector performance measurement

Abstract

PurposeTo consider the extent to which (a) regimes of performance measurement in the public sector are fit for purpose and (b) the likely outcomes for public services and public sector workers of such performance measurement systems. Design/Methodology/ApproachThe article considers 4 key issues: The context and content of performance measurement in the public sector; the specific examples of healthcare and higher education; the limitations of performance measurement systems; the likely outcomes of performance measurement systems. FindingsCurrent systems of performance measurement in the public sector are unlikely to have a significant influence on improving services. The most likely outcomes of these systems is further commodification of services and deprofessionalisation of public sector workers. Originality/ValueThe articles builds on established literature and offers a systematic metaphor-driven critique of performance management in the public sector and discusses the implications of this.

The motivations to study of undergraduate students in management: The impact of degree programme and level of study

“…They identify a number of studies carried out in the 1970s which suggested that the key motivations for students were based around issues such as "intellectual discovery", a "desire for knowledge" and "enthusiasm" (p.3) and argue that, for a number of reasons, this type of motivation is being eroded and replaced by more instrumental motivations whereby education has become "a means towards some end, rather than being valuable in its own right" (p.3). This is a reasonable reflection of a broad cross section of the literature which examines the long term changes in higher education and their impact on traditional views of academia (see, for example, Adcroft & Willis, 2005). This paper aims to answer two broad questions.…”

Cargos de livre nomeação: reflexões com base no empreendedor público em um estado-membro do Brasil

“…Neste ínterim, a ética na governação do princípio tradicional de bemestar público não se alinha com os negócios comerciais que visa ao bem-estar privado. Ao estabelecer uma lógica de mercado nas organizações públicas, a NAP contribui para a mercantilização dos serviços públicos (Adcroft & Willis, 2005); (b) orientação para o cliente ─ T. Diefenbach (2009) adverte que esta prática pode tornar o cidadão um coadjuvante nas decisões públicas, ou seja, um indivíduo que simplesmente exige pronta entrega de um serviço para suas próprias necessidades. Neste caso, observa-se uma inversão de importantes valores democráticos, pois o cidadão deve ser visto como um membro consciente e politicamente ativo do Estado, interessado nos assuntos públicos e no bem-estar de toda comunidade; (c) a NAP contribui para que o setor público perca sua neutralidade.…”

Managing the Indirect Effects of Environmental Regulation and Performance Measurement

“…Only a few of these journals actually concentrated on the unintended consequences as the main focus for research (Adcroft and Willis, 2005;Brigham and Fitzgerald, 2001;Humphreys and Francis, 2002;Shaffer, 1995;Tan and Rae, 2009). The remaining research mainly mentioned the presence of unintended consequences (Meyer, 2004;Powell et al, 2012;Unahabhokha et al, 2006).…”