2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The un-equal playground: Developers and urban activists struggling for the right to the city

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed tool allows for a better understanding of people and places and, most importantly, the place-related needs and preferences among residents. By adopting those new measures in a planning phase, we hope that the risk of failed, mismatched investments within cultural heritage sites can be minimized [45]. In the long run, this approach could help to implement humancentered urban policies [46] and avoid the destruction of the genius loci of many cultural heritage sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed tool allows for a better understanding of people and places and, most importantly, the place-related needs and preferences among residents. By adopting those new measures in a planning phase, we hope that the risk of failed, mismatched investments within cultural heritage sites can be minimized [45]. In the long run, this approach could help to implement humancentered urban policies [46] and avoid the destruction of the genius loci of many cultural heritage sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, the theory of SAFs is predominantly based on Western social facts and theoretical research. Although it has been examined by empirical evidence from Western democracies such as the United States (Chen, 2018;Gast on, 2018;Pettinicchio, 2013) and Europe (Domaradzka, 2015(Domaradzka, , 2017(Domaradzka, , 2019Wijkstr€ om, 2016, 2019;Kauppinen et al, 2017), little is known about the applicability and transferability of this theory in a centralized context.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyde (2018) analyses the seemingly benevolent actions of developers in Toronto and Vancouver to show how they are ‘giving back to get ahead’. Relational work with, or for, the community became an explicit strategy in which developers incorporate – and often alter in doing so – community agendas into their strategies (Domaradzka, 2019). This work draws on literature that questions whether participatory approaches in urban governance can overcome the limitations of top-down planning (Allmendinger and Haughton, 2012; Brownill and Carpenter, 2009; Healey, 1998; Sagoe, 2018).…”
Section: How Developers Navigate Real Estate Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%