1963
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.50.4.761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ultraviolet Photochemistry of Deoxyuridylyl (3′→5′) Deoxyuridine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We propose that the commonly observed tailing effect is due to pyrimidine dimer reactions reaching photostationary state, as described in early UV photolysis literature. 25,26 The reason tailing was observed in region B of MS2 after the same UV 254 dose as region A may be due to the greater number of neighboring uracil bases in the sequence (32 in region B, 19 in region A, SI Table S2). Further research will be necessary to characterize the extent of dimer reversion in different nucleic acids with varied sequences and structures.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We propose that the commonly observed tailing effect is due to pyrimidine dimer reactions reaching photostationary state, as described in early UV photolysis literature. 25,26 The reason tailing was observed in region B of MS2 after the same UV 254 dose as region A may be due to the greater number of neighboring uracil bases in the sequence (32 in region B, 19 in region A, SI Table S2). Further research will be necessary to characterize the extent of dimer reversion in different nucleic acids with varied sequences and structures.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…CPD are the primary form of UV-induced damage in dT 17 with small amounts of the pyrimidine-pyrimidinone photoproduct also forming, whereas CPD and photohydrates are formed in almost equal amounts in rU 17 (1,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) under anoxic conditions. The quantum yields (/) for these processes are /50.044 for CPD formation in poly-dT and / 5 0.012 and / 5 0.015 for photohydrate and CPD formation, respectively, in poly-rU (1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Target dT 17 and rU 17 were used because their photochemistry is well known. CPD are the primary form of UV‐induced damage in dT 17 with small amounts of the pyrimidine‐pyrimidinone [6–4] photoproduct also forming, whereas CPD and photohydrates are formed in almost equal amounts in rU 17 (1,26–30) under anoxic conditions. The quantum yields (φ) for these processes are φ= 0.044 for CPD formation in poly‐dT and φ= 0.012 and 4pH = 0.015 for photohydrate and CPD formation, respectively, in poly‐rU (1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%