“…As with all science, climate science does not speak for itself, it is always interpreted and, therefore, simultaneously political and cultural. Recognizing this, and opening spaces for humanistic scholarship on climate and climate change, thus, seeks to complicate climate discourses and inspire new social understandings, criticisms, and practices (see Howe, 2011; Sabin, 2010). Some scholars aim their critique of climate change discourse squarely at a capitalist system that on the one hand demands the unending economic growth that drives climate change, while on the other hand obscures the uneven landscapes of human vulnerability that the system largely created, all the while supporting technical fixes that commodify the atmosphere and address neither the drivers of climate change nor those most vulnerable to its effects (Liverman, 2009; see also Cupples, 2012; Head and Gibson, 2012; Parenti, 2011).…”