Summary:We evaluated the role of BMT in a cohort of 56 children with ALL relapsing after uniform initial treatment protocols in a single institution between 1990 and 1997. The patients were commenced on a single intensive chemotherapy regimen. All patients with a matched family donor (MFD) were recommended to receive BMT. The outcome was significantly better for patients with a MFD. The overall survival at 8 years was 60.0% (95% CI 35.7-77.6%) and 13.5% (95% CI 4.0-28.6%) for patients with and without MFDs (log-rank chi = 7.50 P = 0.0062). The event-free survival at 8 years was 55.0% (95% CI 11.1-31.3%) and 9.2% (95% CI 2.0-23.3%) for patients with and without MFDs (log-rank chi = 8.87 P = 0.0029). Multivariate analysis confirmed the survival advantage of BMT. There was no statistically significant difference in survival for patients initially relapsing within 3 years of first remission compared to children relapsing beyond 3 years. BMT provides a clear survival advantage for children following their first relapse of ALL. We recommend BMT for all children following first relapse of ALL if a MFD is available. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2002) 30, 1-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703601 Keywords: ALL; BMT; pediatric ALL Although the majority of children with ALL can be cured with their initial chemotherapy, the prognosis for those who relapse is guarded. In the past, there have been various reports of improving prognosis for children suffering their first marrow relapse of ALL, with protocols reporting longterm leukemia-free survival rates ranging from under 20% to 31%. [1][2][3][4][5] However, many of these reports do not include patients relapsing after initial treatment with contemporary intensive chemotherapy. With the current intensification of front-line protocols and further improved identification of high risk groups at diagnosis, patients who relapse tend to have resistant disease. Further intensification of chemotherapy, often including BMT is the major option. 6-18 How much advantage BMT in second clinical remission (CR2) offers over intensive chemotherapy alone remains controversial. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] In particular, it has not been conclusively established whether BMT should be the preferred treatment option for children suffering relapses late after first remission, or at all sites.There have been no randomized trials of chemotherapy vs BMT in CR2 in children. It is unlikely that such trials will be conducted because of the clinical impression that BMT offers a survival advantage and consequent ethical concerns about withholding BMT from children with a suitable BMT donor. Donor vs no donor studies are one form of analysis that offer a relatively unbiased comparison between BMT and alternative treatment options. 19 'Biological randomization' is achieved in donor vs no donor studies by the allocation of all patients with suitable family donors to the BMT group and comparing their outcome to that of children without a suitable donor using intention to treat analysis. We report the outcome of a cohort...