2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.01891.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The UK experience in treating relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a report on the Medical Research Council UKALLR1 study

Abstract: Summary. We have examined the toxicity and overall outcome of the Medical Research Council UKALL R1 protocol for 256 patients with relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Second remission was achieved in over 95% of patients. Two patients died during induction and seven patients died of resistant disease. The overall actuarial event-free survival (EFS) at 5 years for all patients experiencing a ®rst relapse was 46% (95% CI 40± 52). Duration of ®rst remission, site of relapse, age at diagnosis a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
91
2
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
12
91
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is similar to the overall experience reported in the last 10 years by some, 3,10 but not all 6 other groups. The reported overall outcome of a cohort of relapsed ALL patients is likely to be influenced by a number of factors including duration of follow-up, process of selection of the cohort, rate of attainment of second remission, and intensity of initial treatment received by the patients in first remission, as well as the nature of the therapy delivered to the patients following second remission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is similar to the overall experience reported in the last 10 years by some, 3,10 but not all 6 other groups. The reported overall outcome of a cohort of relapsed ALL patients is likely to be influenced by a number of factors including duration of follow-up, process of selection of the cohort, rate of attainment of second remission, and intensity of initial treatment received by the patients in first remission, as well as the nature of the therapy delivered to the patients following second remission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The finding of no significant difference in outcome between initial early or late relapsing patients appears to differ from the findings of previous studies. 6,10,13 However, these studies report a shorter follow-up than our cohort. The differences in outcome between initial early and late relapsing patients may also become less apparent with further follow-up in those cohorts.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] However, the treatment is still controversial for low-risk relapses, which either involve extramedullary sites only and/or occur late in the BM. [10][11][12][13][14] Autologous transplantation may be an alternative to chemotherapy for ALL in CR2 after low-risk relapse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a UK study by Lawson et al 18 the relative benefit of allo-HCT and continued chemo was determined in a cohort of 246 children with ALL in second remission by matched donor availability comparison. For children allocated to allo-HCT the 7-year event-free survival was 45% and for those assigned to continued chemo it was 39.7%, not a significant difference when adjusted for time to transplant, duration of first remission, marrow involvement at relapse and age at diagnosis (Figure 2).…”
Section: All In Second Remission After Relapse Following First Remissionmentioning
confidence: 99%