The UDSA ontology: An ontology to support real time urban sustainability assessment

Kuster, Corentin; Hippolyte, Jean-Laurent; Rezgui, Yacine

doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2019.102731

Cited by 30 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the design phase, information, construction knowledge, environmental, social and economic impacts need to be taken into overall consideration [93]. It is necessary to unify decision-makers, supervisors, investors, designers, construction parties, owners, and other stakeholders to participate in the design of BIM [8].…”

Section: Sustainable Building Blockchain and Bimmentioning

confidence: 99%

Blockchain and Building Information Management (BIM) for Sustainable Building Development within the Context of Smart Cities

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

‘Smart cities’ are a new type of city where stakeholders are jointly responsible for urban management. City Information Management (CIM) is an output tool for smart city planning and management, which assists in achieving the sustainable development of urban infrastructure, and promotes smart cities to achieve the goals of stable global economic development, sustainable environmental development, and improvement of people’s quality of life. Existing research has so far established that blockchain and BIM have great potential to enhance construction project performance. However, there is little research on how blockchain and BIM can support sustainable building design and construction. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to explore the potential impact of the integration of blockchain and BIM in a smart city environment on making buildings more sustainable within the context of CIM/Smart Cities. The paper explores the relationships between blockchain, BIM and sustainable building across the life cycle stage of a construction project. This paper queries the Web of Science (WoS) database with keywords to obtain relevant publication, and then uses the VOSviewer to visually analyze the relationships between blockchain, BIM, and sustainable building within the context of smart cities and CIM, which is conducted in bibliometric analysis followed by micro scheme analysis. The results demonstrate the value of this method in gauging the importance of these three topics, highlighting their interrelationships and identifying trends, giving researchers an objective research direction. Those aspects reported in the paper constitute an original contribution.

show abstract

Section: Sustainable Building Blockchain and Bimmentioning

confidence: 99%

Blockchain and Building Information Management (BIM) for Sustainable Building Development within the Context of Smart Cities

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Urban sustainability assessment arrangements tackle thoroughly the convolution of the urban settings by use of a systems method [121][122][123][124], taking into account environmental, social, and economic demands. Swift urban growth has gradually endangered urban environments, thus impacting urban sustainability assessment.…”

Section: Environmental Performance Of Urban Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Sustainability Behavior and Environmental Performance of Urban Systems: A Systematic Review

Pera

2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this systematic review, I cumulate previous research findings indicating that sustainable urbanism and networked public governance can be instrumental in carrying out extensive sustainability and resilience objectives through steering urban transformations in the direction of sustainability and resilience. Urban analytics data infrastructure, multicriteria sustainability evaluation, and sustainable performance assessment display the intricate network dynamics operational within cities, impacting urban resilience decision-making processes and leading to equitable and sustainable urban development. Throughout July 2020, I conducted a quantitative literature review of the Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest databases, search terms including “sustainable urban planning,” “urban sustainability assessment,” “sustainable urban governance/urban sustainability governance,” “sustainable urban development,” “sustainable/sustainability behavior,” and “environmental performance.” As I focused on research published exclusively in the past two years, only 301 various types of articles met the eligibility criteria. By removing those whose results were inconclusive, unconfirmed by replication, or too general, and because of space constraints, I selected 153, mainly empirical, sources. Future research should investigate whether the assessment of environmental sustainability performance of heterogeneous urban configurations by shared sustainability policymaking through spatial green infrastructure planning and regulations articulate sustainable urban design and governance for the development of innovative performance.

show abstract

“…Analysing sustainability of an urban district requires more data processing than that for a single building taken in isolation from the processes in its surroundings. This allows establishing a real-time link between the actions taken in the urban area and the indicators representing certain aspects of sustainability [21]. Good assessment of horticultural site specifics such as local plants material, soil features, water availability, and other make the basis for a good landscape design that often starts with site remediation, water flow, and soil rehabilitation conclude Bassuk & Trowbridge [22].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying Key Criteria for Quality Assessment of Landscape Architecture Projects

Stauskis

2020

Architecture and Urban Planning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstractthe question of quality of modified landscape is critical for the client and the users and depends on the quality of projects. After theoretical and empirical research, the paper proposes the framework for quality assessment criteria and corresponding indicators for assessing landscape architecture projects. By thorough analysis of the recent international research and design and implementation practices in Lithuania, the paper gives the flexible and universal set of environmental, socio-economic, and aesthetic quality criteria and relevant indicators in the context of sustainable performance.

show abstract

The UDSA ontology: An ontology to support real time urban sustainability assessment

Cited by 30 publications

References 34 publications

Blockchain and Building Information Management (BIM) for Sustainable Building Development within the Context of Smart Cities

Blockchain and Building Information Management (BIM) for Sustainable Building Development within the Context of Smart Cities

Assessing Sustainability Behavior and Environmental Performance of Urban Systems: A Systematic Review

Identifying Key Criteria for Quality Assessment of Landscape Architecture Projects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About