1985
DOI: 10.1097/00132586-198510000-00051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The UCLA Population Studies of Chronic Obstructive Respiratory Disease. VIII. Effects of Smoking Cessation on Lung Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
2
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
48
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But, other cross-sectional studies, such as the Beijing respiratory health study [2], a Canadian study [14], the French Cooperative study [8], the Tucson Airways study [15] and both a cross-sectional and longitudinal study from Copenhagen [4,16] have reported a greater decline in lung function among females than males, associated with tobacco smoking. On the other hand, opposite results have been found in both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, such as the Six Cities study [17], the Tucson Airways Study [18], the cross-sectional part of the Netherlands study [13], the Copenhagen study (after redefining exclusion criteria, but not adjusting for quantity smoked) [19], an Italian study [20] and the UCLA study from Los Angeles [21]. Comparisons between crosssectional and longitudinal studies are distorted, as those with better lung function are more likely to continue in longitudinal studies [13].…”
Section: Tobacco Smoking and Lung Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, other cross-sectional studies, such as the Beijing respiratory health study [2], a Canadian study [14], the French Cooperative study [8], the Tucson Airways study [15] and both a cross-sectional and longitudinal study from Copenhagen [4,16] have reported a greater decline in lung function among females than males, associated with tobacco smoking. On the other hand, opposite results have been found in both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, such as the Six Cities study [17], the Tucson Airways Study [18], the cross-sectional part of the Netherlands study [13], the Copenhagen study (after redefining exclusion criteria, but not adjusting for quantity smoked) [19], an Italian study [20] and the UCLA study from Los Angeles [21]. Comparisons between crosssectional and longitudinal studies are distorted, as those with better lung function are more likely to continue in longitudinal studies [13].…”
Section: Tobacco Smoking and Lung Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2007, COPD accounted for 5% of all deaths (4) but the WHO predicts an increase in COPD-related deaths of more than 30% in the next 10 years, emphasising the continued impact this disease will have internationally (6). Cigarette smoking remains the most important risk factor for the development of COPD (7) although only approximately 20% of smokers develop clinically significant disease (8). This suggests that a combination of genetic and environmental factors interact to cause COPD, and there has been much research aiming to identify candidate genes that may confer genetic susceptibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'117 A dose effect has been reported,'6"2" 2' although this has been inconsistent and often crudely measured.8 Parental smoking has also been associated with decreased pulmonary function and lung growth in children. '114"l9, [22][23][24][25] The mechanism of effect of passive smoking on childhood reactive airway disease is not clear. Sidestream tobacco smoke may be directly toxic to the lungs of children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%