“…For example, in a wide-ranging critique of opposition to nuclear power, an energy source that he believes necessary for continued economic growth and prosperity, Nisbet (1979) views such opposition as a manifestation of declining &dquo;faith in progress.&dquo; By implication, then, continued growth and prosperity could be guaranteed (ecological scarcity notwithstanding) if only we could restore that faith. Similarly, Bell (1977: 18), in a strong defense of economic growth and a scathing attack on the idea of physical limits to growth, assures readers that, &dquo;If one thinks only in physical terms, then it is likely that one does not need to worry about ever running out of resources.&dquo; This unecological view is consistent, of course, with his long-held vision of a &dquo;post-industrial society,&dquo; premised as that view is on absence of ecological constraints such as resource scarcity (Marien, 1977). Bell does, however, acknowledge the possibility that there may be &dquo;social limits to growth.&dquo; If there are limits to the development of human societies, Bell seems to be saying, they must be social rather than physical.…”