2016
DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2014.902225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The two-step approach—a significant ANOVA F-test before Dunnett's comparisons against a control—is not recommended

Abstract: Decision-tree approaches are commonly used in the analysis of toxicological assays. This paper considers the widely-used and recommended approach of first applying the ANOVA F-test and, if it is significant, using the many-to-one comparison procedure of Dunnett (1955).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the data did not have a normal distribution before and even after transformation. Therefore, Steel's test (a non-parametric version of the Dunnett test; [38]) was used to determine which means differed from the control considering that several authors suggested that errors in statistics can be prevented by carrying out direct comparisons with the control without subjecting the data to analysis of variance (ANOVA), especially when monotonicity between the dose and response is not assumed [39,40]. Nevertheless, the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was performed as well, and the obtained findings are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the data did not have a normal distribution before and even after transformation. Therefore, Steel's test (a non-parametric version of the Dunnett test; [38]) was used to determine which means differed from the control considering that several authors suggested that errors in statistics can be prevented by carrying out direct comparisons with the control without subjecting the data to analysis of variance (ANOVA), especially when monotonicity between the dose and response is not assumed [39,40]. Nevertheless, the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was performed as well, and the obtained findings are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values were derived from four individual experiments for frogs immediately killed after 12 mo of exposure and from three individual experiments for frogs killed after 12 mo of depuration postexposure. Since the statistical distribution of the replicates was unknown (Gaussian or not) for four or three replicates, the comparison of each treatment (either BaP or TCS) with a single control was performed using the many-to-one comparison test of Dunnett (80,81) after log-transforming the data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For snout-vent length and weight of F1 individuals, since the nature of the distribution of the results was not Gaussian for TCS parental exposure, the comparison of each parental treatment (either BaP or TCS) with a single control was performed using the many-to-one comparison test of Dunnett (80,81) after log-transforming the data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test compares several sample groups with a control group to determine whether their mean value is significantly different from the control group. 26 This test is done using the Minitab software 27 to determine whether (1) the freeze/thaw cycles have an impact on the welded joints LSS and (2) the joints welded using a silane-coated HE present higher LSS than joints welded using UT HE. UT/Wet, Si/Dry and Si/Wet joints are compared to UT/Dry joints after 0, 135, 200, 500 and 1000 temperature cycles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%