SAE Technical Paper Series 1998
DOI: 10.4271/980766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “Two-in-One” Engine - Porsche's Variable Valve System (VVS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By either early or late intake valve closing, the Miller cycle can decouple the expansion ratio and the compression ratio of the engine so that the effective compression is significantly lower than the 2 of 26 geometric compression ratio [2,3]. In 1998, Porsche developed the VarioCam Plus system that combines the best features of shifting the timing phases and changes of cam profile [4]. This system applied in the 911 Turbo uses a hydraulic camshaft phaser with helical teeth instead of changing the chain length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By either early or late intake valve closing, the Miller cycle can decouple the expansion ratio and the compression ratio of the engine so that the effective compression is significantly lower than the 2 of 26 geometric compression ratio [2,3]. In 1998, Porsche developed the VarioCam Plus system that combines the best features of shifting the timing phases and changes of cam profile [4]. This system applied in the 911 Turbo uses a hydraulic camshaft phaser with helical teeth instead of changing the chain length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cam profile switching can be realized using the device described by Lee et al 21 or the cam-switching mechanism reported by Inoue et al 23 and Brüstle and Schwarzenthal. 24 Recently, our group developed a new cam-profile-switching device, as shown in Figure 2. Prototype testing showed that it can realize two-stroke and four-stroke mode switching and it can be adopted in the proposed concept.…”
Section: Pneumatic Hybrid System Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case under consideration, it was assumed that the time should be comparable to that resulting from the Vibe function, i.e., taking into account the angle of rotation of the crankshaft. Ignoring the detonation combustion situations occurring, for example, in HCCI engines[9,11], the combustion time of which is too short (0.05 ms to 0.2 ms), it can be approximated that in the current combustion systems of engines with GI the burning time is between 0.4ms and 3ms, which is mainly due to the load and the combustion system used, which is approximated by the Vibe function[5]. The time from the theoretical analysis is shorter, 50 to 60%, than the empirical results presented in Figures14-16, because the analysis did not take into account the heat transfer and the effect of slowing down the combustion process for faster volumetric work by the ACC system.The ACC system, which is a viable technical solution, performs an additional volume change using the so-called additional piston with a very low weight (approximately 130 g) and pneumatic support.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%