The Twitter parliamentarian database: Analyzing Twitter politics across 26 countries

Abstract

This article introduces the Twitter Parliamentarian Database (TPD), a multi-source and manually validated database of parliamentarians on Twitter. The TPD includes parliamentarians from all European Free Trade Association countries where over 45% of parliamentarians are on Twitter as well as a selection of English-speaking countries. The database is designed to move beyond the one-off nature of most Twitter-based research and in the direction of systematic and rigorous comparative and transnational analysis. The TPD incorporates, in addition to data collected through Twitter’s streaming API and governmental websites, data from the Manifesto Project Database; the Electoral System Design Database; the ParlGov database; and the Chapel Hill Expert Survey. By compiling these different data sources it becomes possible to compare different countries, political parties, political party families, and different kinds of democracies. To illustrate the opportunities for comparative and transnational analysis that the TPD opens up, we ask: What are the differences between countries in parliamentarian Twitter interactions? How do political parties differ in their use of hashtags and what is their common ground? What is the structure of interaction between parliamentarians in the transnational debate? Alongside some interesting similarities, we find striking cross-party and particularly cross-national differences in how parliamentarians engage in politics on the social media platform.

Moral Expressions in 280 Characters or Less: An Analysis of Politician Tweets Following the 2016 Brexit Referendum Vote

“…The entire stream of tweets from 590 British Parliamentarians was gathered using Twitter’s Streaming API from June 1, 2017 until the election of the new parliament on December 12, 2019 ( van Vliet et al, 2020 ). During this time, there were parliamentary deadlocks on what exactly would happen in the divorce process with the EU.…”

Political Interaction Beyond Party Lines: Communication Ties and Party Polarization in Parliamentary Twitter Networks

“…Among the different communication layers (relations, retweets, and mentions) on Twitter, we have focused on MPs’ mentions because this network better reflects cross-party and cross-ideological connections (Esteve Del Valle & Borge Bravo, 2018a) as well as MPs’ personalized communication behavior (Thamm & Bleier, 2013) and is more decentralized than following–follower and retweet networks (Conover et al, 2011; Hsu & Park, 2012; Yoon & Park, 2014). Furthermore, previous research has shown that politicians actively use mentions to converse with each other (Esteve Del Valle & Borge Bravo, 2018a; van Vliet et al, 2020), mostly to criticize members of other parties, that is, “point out any apparent mistakes, misbehavior or false statement of their rivals” (Laaksonen et al, 2017, p. 117). Last, compared to the broadcasting practices of parliamentarians in other countries (e.g., the United Kingdom or the United States), Dutch MPs are highly conversational on Twitter, notably vis-à-vis other members of the Tweede Kamer , the Dutch House of Representatives (see Tromble, 2018).…”

Making sense of COVID-19 over time in New Zealand: Assessing the public conversation using Twitter

“…As a result, in the last several years, the use of big data analytics to make sense of the tremendous volume of first-hand user-generated information accumulated on social media is becoming increasingly popular [e.g., 3 , 16 , 17 – 19 ]. Amongst social media platforms, Twitter has been the platform of most interest to researchers [ 20 ].…”