2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(01)00028-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The twisting force of aged consumers when opening a jar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
54
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum torque (8.7 Nm) previously reported during opening actions of a 'jar' (Voorbij and Steenbekkers 2002) was four times larger than the maximum torque (2.1 Nm) found in the present study. The difference could be due to: (a) the difference between the diameters of the circular objects tested (6.6 cm in Voorbij and Steenbekkers (2002) vs. 4.5 cm in this study); (b) the different grasping configurations (two-hand power grip vs. multi-digit precision grip); and (c) different friction coefficients of the contact surfaces (unknown coefficient of an aluminium surface vs. 1.5).…”
Section: Total Moments In Opening and Closing Directionscontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum torque (8.7 Nm) previously reported during opening actions of a 'jar' (Voorbij and Steenbekkers 2002) was four times larger than the maximum torque (2.1 Nm) found in the present study. The difference could be due to: (a) the difference between the diameters of the circular objects tested (6.6 cm in Voorbij and Steenbekkers (2002) vs. 4.5 cm in this study); (b) the different grasping configurations (two-hand power grip vs. multi-digit precision grip); and (c) different friction coefficients of the contact surfaces (unknown coefficient of an aluminium surface vs. 1.5).…”
Section: Total Moments In Opening and Closing Directionscontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…In such an action, the fingers act in parallel and the forces acting on the object are easier to measure and quantify (Kinoshita et al 1995, 1996a, Santello and Soechting 2000, Rearick and Santello 2002, Shim et al 2003,b, 2005a. While several previous studies have addressed the manipulation of circular objects (Amis 1987, Lee and Rim 1991, Radhakrishnan and Nagaravindra 1993, Kinoshita et al 1996b, Shih and Wang 1997, Fowler and Nicol 1999, they mainly focused on the resultant force/moment (Fowler andNicol 1999, Voorbij andSteenbekkers 2002), single-digit force exerted on the object (Fowler and Nicol 1999) or the force production without a twisting action (Kinoshita et al 1996b). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the elderly and the young groups exhibited significantly different torque and force profiles when attempting to open the bottles. Similar work was also conducted by researchers focusing on the opening force measurement and opening postures of bottles and jars [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].This interest in understanding the issues around openability has led to the development of European and international guidelines on the measurement of packaging seal forces and user test panel methods. The European technical specification DD CEN/TS 15945 [26] launched in 2011 sets out a framework for ease of opening evaluation for packaging and has more recently been superseded by ISO17480.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Rowson and Yoxall [30] also reported that typically, women chose a grip that maximized their opportunity of opening the closure and that this grip choice was more limited than that available for men. According to Voorbij and Steenbekkers [18], gender influenced twisting force and opening toque when opening a jar of jam. Yoxall et al [21] studied squeeze strength with bottles and confirmed that women produced consistently lower forces than men.…”
Section: Fig 6-peel Force and Elongation At Break Of Machine And Hummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Han et al have investigated that the relationship between tab ring shape and the feelings in the fingertip when opening aluminum beverage cans; and they have concluded that the tab with a larger contact area with finger is better 1 . Openability of the bottle caps, which is one of a demand of aluminum beverage bottles for consumers' satisfaction, has been studied by some researchers [2][3][4][5][6][7] . However, these researchers have not determined the optimum opening diameter that is easy to open.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%