2018
DOI: 10.1080/19436149.2018.1447773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Turkish Media Structure in Judicial and Political Context: An Illustration of Values and Status Negotiation

Abstract: As a structural phenomenon, media as a collective entity occupies a unique field of negotiation between community and authority, a location of autonomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since it was founded in the early 20th century, the Republic of Turkey has had to navigate perennial politico-cultural tensions caused by the clash between Kemalist laicism and political Islamicism. This has resulted in a uniquely Turkish political economy of the media with its culture-specific legal interpretations of freedom of expression, media agency and instrumentality in real space and cyberspace (Farmanfarmaian et al, 2018; Kaya and Çakmur, 2010). Akser and Baybars-Hawks (2012) suggest that Turkey has evolved into a country with a neoliberal model of media autocracy characterized by economic pressure on media outlets, judicial suppression, Internet blackouts and banishment of YouTube and other platforms that could be used to post material critical of the government.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it was founded in the early 20th century, the Republic of Turkey has had to navigate perennial politico-cultural tensions caused by the clash between Kemalist laicism and political Islamicism. This has resulted in a uniquely Turkish political economy of the media with its culture-specific legal interpretations of freedom of expression, media agency and instrumentality in real space and cyberspace (Farmanfarmaian et al, 2018; Kaya and Çakmur, 2010). Akser and Baybars-Hawks (2012) suggest that Turkey has evolved into a country with a neoliberal model of media autocracy characterized by economic pressure on media outlets, judicial suppression, Internet blackouts and banishment of YouTube and other platforms that could be used to post material critical of the government.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state began to make use of the regulatory institutions, to restructure the media landscape and bring the media on-side. Legislation was also used to silence and/or intimidate journalists (Farmanfarmaian, Sonay, and Akser 2018). The mainstream media reflected the features of a highly polarized media system and mostly supported the socio-political camps of the AKP, the G€ ulen movement or the Kemalists (Panayirci, Iseri, and Sekercioglu 2016).…”
Section: Turkeymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mainstream media reflected the features of a highly polarized media system and mostly supported the socio-political camps of the AKP, the G€ ulen movement or the Kemalists (Panayirci, Iseri, and Sekercioglu 2016). After the attempted coup, media institutions became increasingly homogenous and the variety of media perspectives declined (Farmanfarmaian, Sonay, and Akser 2018).…”
Section: Turkeymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have described different strategies, such as violent acts against journalists by the security forces and the police (Relly and Zanger 2017;Hussein 2018). These include judicial and online harassment, physical attacks, assault, arbitrary arrest and detention (Farmanfarmaian, Sonay, and Akser 2018;Orgeret and Tayeebwa 2016;Yesil 2018). For instance, police abuse journalists while they are preparing reports at an event site or state officials arbitrarily interrogate journalists (UNAMI 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%