2013
DOI: 10.4161/cam.23648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The tumor suppressor geneARHI(DIRAS3)inhibits ovarian cancer cell migration through multiple mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with data showing a negative correlation between EPCAM and ZEB1 in several cancer cell lines (47, 48). The roles of JAM-A, DIRAS3 and MARVELD3 as potential tumor suppressors and promoters of epithelial phenotype have been previously described (4951). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the negative correlation between ZEB1 and JAM-A, DIRAS3 and MARVELD3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our findings are consistent with data showing a negative correlation between EPCAM and ZEB1 in several cancer cell lines (47, 48). The roles of JAM-A, DIRAS3 and MARVELD3 as potential tumor suppressors and promoters of epithelial phenotype have been previously described (4951). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the negative correlation between ZEB1 and JAM-A, DIRAS3 and MARVELD3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Studies have shown that ARHI inhibits cell growth in HOC and that loss of ARHI expression contributes to the formation of HOC 11. When ARHI re-expression was promoted using demethylation factors and histone deacetylase inhibitors in different tissues, tumor growth rates were reduced, and apoptosis increased 12.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6b and d). Alternatively, ARHI expression has also been shown to alter the subcellular localization of STAT3 [25] which plays an important role in maintaining the activity of Complex I and II in the electron transport chain [26]. Either of these mechanisms could explain the observed bioenergetic shock although additional experiments are necessary to determine which (if any) of these are relevant in the ARHI model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%