2020
DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1736976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Truth behind the Zeros: A New Approach to Principal Component Analysis of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…by multiplying the severity score of 0 to 3 by the frequency score of 0 to 4 so that the values 5, 7, 10 and 11 cannot be observed. 49, 50 Using symptom-specific instruments such as the Apathy Evaluation Scale (score range 18– 71), Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (score range 29–203), and Geriatric Depression Scale (score range 0–30) may not only help to fully characterize specific NPS, but also enables the use of statisical modelling due to a larger variation in potential scores compared to the NPI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by multiplying the severity score of 0 to 3 by the frequency score of 0 to 4 so that the values 5, 7, 10 and 11 cannot be observed. 49, 50 Using symptom-specific instruments such as the Apathy Evaluation Scale (score range 18– 71), Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (score range 29–203), and Geriatric Depression Scale (score range 0–30) may not only help to fully characterize specific NPS, but also enables the use of statisical modelling due to a larger variation in potential scores compared to the NPI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a systemic review has found a relatively low concordance of the composition of NPI clusters among available evidence although some consistent associations of specific symptoms defining potential subsyndromes in AD across studies had been observed [56]. Acknowledging this limitation, a novel version of principal component analysis that mitigates excessive floor effects in NPI scores has been developed for more robust identification of neurobehavioral subsyndromes [57]. Therefore, future studies could use this approach to test the replicability of the associations between neurobehavioral subsyndromes and metabolic decline reported in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a systemic review found a relatively low concordance of the composition of NPI clusters among available evidence although some consistent associations of speci c symptoms de ning potential subsyndromes in AD across studies had been observed [57]. Acknowledging the limitations of studying NPI subsyndromes using principal component analysis (PCA), a novel version of PCA has been developed for a more robust factor analysis of the NPI [58]. Therefore, future studies will need to con rm these associations between the NPI-Q subsyndromes with metabolic decline in a separate cohort using a more robust factor analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%