2013
DOI: 10.1080/10282580.2013.798519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The truth and the trial: victim participation, restorative justice, and the International Criminal Court

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also had their own legal representation and were able to express the harm they experienced in a public forum. See Garbett (2012). 22.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also had their own legal representation and were able to express the harm they experienced in a public forum. See Garbett (2012). 22.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Así mismo, como lo señala Garbett (2013), en relación con la participación de las víctimas en el mismo caso Lubanga, su objetivo era decir la verdad y nada más que la verdad, lo que a su juicio se debe interpretar como un elemento de la justicia restaurativa, pues su participación no tiene como finalidad definir si el acusado es culpable o inocente, sino que su versión de los hechos sea escuchada y analizada, además de tener el potencial de ayudar a llenar los vacíos que pueda tener la teoría del caso presentada por el fiscal.…”
Section: Tensión Entre Aporte De Evidencia Y Testimonio Como Formas D...unclassified
“…This is not to take away the fact that, often, victims can find the very act of providing testimony of the harms and experiences of the alleged criminal conduct an empowering and cathartic process. 31 However, the fact that the Rome Statute is more concerned with providing victims a theoretical right of participation than allowing them to meaningfully influence the criminal process is evident also from the absence of consideration of victim submissions in the final judgments of the Court. The judgments do not provide any accounts of the forms of knowledge brought by the victim participants as distinct from those of the prosecution or defence.…”
Section: Manner Of Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%