2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1909.04002
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Trumpiest Trump? Identifying a Subject's Most Characteristic Tweets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) Engagement of posts: We further examine the engagement of both categories. Prior studies have revealed a high correlation between the topic continuity and engagement of posts [31], [32]. Especially when evaluating the engagement between users, the number of replies (comments generated under a post) works as a significant predictive indicator.…”
Section: ) Daily Volume Of Posts and Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Engagement of posts: We further examine the engagement of both categories. Prior studies have revealed a high correlation between the topic continuity and engagement of posts [31], [32]. Especially when evaluating the engagement between users, the number of replies (comments generated under a post) works as a significant predictive indicator.…”
Section: ) Daily Volume Of Posts and Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This task is inspired by some previous works, such as newcomers' socialization [12,20,21], social expression [16] and response prediction [3,4], etc. The reasons why we employ "receiving a reply" to represent successful engagement can be summarized as twofold: (1) Pethe and Skiena [36] shows that replies, likes (which are used to show appreciation for a post [34]), retweets are highly correlated. (2) We conduct an interesting human evaluation (see Table 6), and the results show that posts that received replies are more successful than posts with silent responses in four indicators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%