2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0008423914000894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The True North Strong and Free Healthcare? Nationalism and Attitudes Towards Private Healthcare Options in Canada

Abstract: This article endeavours to explain why English Canadians and Quebeckers differ in their opinions about private healthcare options. Data indicates that respondents in the nine predominantly English-speaking provinces are more likely to oppose private hospitals than Quebeckers. No one province or region in “English Canada” drives these results: aversion to private hospitals is consistent across the nine provinces. Research on welfare states slots Canada into the “liberal” category, which is indicative of a prefe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Canada prides itself on its universal healthcare system, and many consider it to be inextricable from Canadians' sense of national identity (Dufresne et al 2014). Internationally, Canada is often regarded as egalitarian, with a "genuine commitment to comprehensive, accessible health care for all its citizens" (Rodney and Copeland 2009).…”
Section: Canadamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canada prides itself on its universal healthcare system, and many consider it to be inextricable from Canadians' sense of national identity (Dufresne et al 2014). Internationally, Canada is often regarded as egalitarian, with a "genuine commitment to comprehensive, accessible health care for all its citizens" (Rodney and Copeland 2009).…”
Section: Canadamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the larger the number of people availing the health services provided by the country, the better as this indicates a strong healthcare (Dufresne, et. al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These large rights-based programmes epitomize a logic of social citizenship – ‘the provision of social benefits to citizens on uniform terms and conditions, irrespective of the region in which they live’ (Banting, 2006: 64). Banting (2006) underlined various factors why rights-based programmes are the central government’s responsibility, including: culture, nationalism, policy preferences and the formation of welfare states at a time when central governments were dominant constitutionally and fiscally (see also Béland and Lecours, 2006; Dufresne et al, 2014). He also discussed economic theories of federalism according to which central governments should be responsible for macroeconomic policy, stabilization and redistribution and local governments for the provision of public goods and services tailored to local realities.…”
Section: Bringing the Subnational Welfare State Back Inmentioning
confidence: 99%