1982
DOI: 10.1086/160516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The tropospheric gas composition of Jupiter's north equatorial belt /NH3, PH3, CH3D, GeH4, H2O/ and the Jovian D/H isotopic ratio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
97
1
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
97
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1) using the Jovian temperature proÐle from V oyager (Lindal et al 1981), the relation for vapor pressure given in Appendix A, and a subcloud mole fraction of 3 ] 10~5 (a wide range of abundances below the expected base of the Jovian ammonia cloud have been reported ; we adopt the value at 0.6 bars retrieved by Kunde et al [1982] for the Northern Equatorial Belt, which also agrees with the best-Ðt values of Carlson, Lacis, & Rossow [1993] and Brooke et al [1998]). The cloud base appears at 0.42 bars, where the temperature is 129 K. Although absent in the Ðgures of Lewis (1969 ; likely caused by reduced vertical resolution), in our interpretation of that model, the vapor is not entirely depleted in the lowest reaches of the cloud (where hence, increases above the cloud q c \ q t ) ; q c base.…”
Section: Previous Modelsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…1) using the Jovian temperature proÐle from V oyager (Lindal et al 1981), the relation for vapor pressure given in Appendix A, and a subcloud mole fraction of 3 ] 10~5 (a wide range of abundances below the expected base of the Jovian ammonia cloud have been reported ; we adopt the value at 0.6 bars retrieved by Kunde et al [1982] for the Northern Equatorial Belt, which also agrees with the best-Ðt values of Carlson, Lacis, & Rossow [1993] and Brooke et al [1998]). The cloud base appears at 0.42 bars, where the temperature is 129 K. Although absent in the Ðgures of Lewis (1969 ; likely caused by reduced vertical resolution), in our interpretation of that model, the vapor is not entirely depleted in the lowest reaches of the cloud (where hence, increases above the cloud q c \ q t ) ; q c base.…”
Section: Previous Modelsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…It was known from remote sensing observations that the atmosphere above the tropopause, about the 150 mbar level (260 mbar in the 5-/xm hot spot), is stably stratified [Kunde et al, 1982;Eshleman et al, 1979] Ioannou and Lindzen [1994] suggested, the interior heat flux of Jupiter might then be carried out in a number of isolated thermal plumes, rather than by a global-scale convective pattern, and the driving mechanism for the zonal winds might be the gravitational tides rather than solar and internal heating [Ioannou and Lindzen, 1994]. One of the primary objectives of the ASI experiment was to determine the static stability of the atmosphere over the entire range of heights for which temperature was either directly measured during probe descent, or inferred from probe accelerations during entry.…”
Section: Static Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the region observed by the RT spectra was similar to that encountered by the Galileo entry probe, the temperature/pressure profile was assumed to be that returned by the probe [Seiff et al, 1996]. The mean a priori composition was then set to that shown in Table 1 and is based upon the probe mass spectrometer results [Niemann et al, 1996] and previous studies of the Voyager infrared imaging spectrometer (IRIS) data such as Kunde et al [1982], Carlson et al [1993], and other sources listed in the table. The atmosphere was split at pressures below 11 bars into 20 layers of equal path length, found to be the best compromise between speed and error by comparison with a precision line-by-line model using many layers (section 3.1.3).…”
Section: Forward Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%