2007
DOI: 10.1029/2007jd008539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The tropical forest and fire emissions experiment: Emission, chemistry, and transport of biogenic volatile organic compounds in the lower atmosphere over Amazonia

Abstract: [1] Airborne and ground-based mixing ratio and flux measurements using eddy covariance (EC) and for the first time the mixed layer gradient (MLG) and mixed layer variance (MLV) techniques are used to assess the impact of isoprene and monoterpene emissions on atmospheric chemistry in the Amazon basin. Average noon isoprene (7.8 ± 2.3 mg/m 2 /h) and monoterpene fluxes (1.2 ± 0.5 mg/m 2 /h) compared well between ground and airborne measurements and are higher than fluxes estimated in this region during other seas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
320
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(347 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
25
320
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The entrainment flux out of the boundary is estimated to be 30% of the emission flux as was recently found for isoprene flux measurements from an aircraft over the Amazonian rain forest [Karl et al, 2007] using the mixed layer gradient method. This might not be representative for the forest in the United States and could therefore contribute to the error in this calculation as discussed below.…”
Section: Isoprene Emissions Estimated From the Aircraft Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The entrainment flux out of the boundary is estimated to be 30% of the emission flux as was recently found for isoprene flux measurements from an aircraft over the Amazonian rain forest [Karl et al, 2007] using the mixed layer gradient method. This might not be representative for the forest in the United States and could therefore contribute to the error in this calculation as discussed below.…”
Section: Isoprene Emissions Estimated From the Aircraft Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Another large error involves the entrainment flux from the boundary layer. Here a constant flux of 30% from the emissions was used [Karl et al, 2007]. The entrainment flux certainly will not be a constant fraction of the emissions and will be larger or smaller than the 30% in different areas and time of day.…”
Section: Warneke Et Al: Biogenic Emissions and Inventoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On average, the model values were about 47.5% higher than observation-based results over the measuring period. This difference can be explained by (1) observation-based fluxes having strong sudden decreases, which are related to the measured approach (Karl et al, 2007); (2) low observation-based fluxes occurring on some days, due to the low mixing layer height and low measured isoprene concentrations on these days. Given the uncertainties in this approach, this comparison indicates that the local constrained MEGAN tends to predict the isoprene emission reasonably well for this location and time.…”
Section: Modeled Isoprene Emission and Its Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial atmospheric conditions used are based on the TROpical Forest and Fire Emissions Experiment (TROFFEE) (Karl et al 2007;Vilà-Guerau de Arellano et al 2011), adapted by Ouwersloot et al (2013) to ensure that shallow Cu convection occurs with no deep convection. The initial conditions follow Amazonian surface and upper-air conditions: the initial boundary-layer height is 200 m with a potential temperature (θ ) of 300 K and a specific humidity (q) of 16 × 10 −6 kg kg −1 .…”
Section: Design Of Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%