2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07751-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The trophic role of a large marine predator, the tiger shark Galeocerdo cuvier

Abstract: Tiger sharks were sampled off the western (Ningaloo Reef, Shark Bay) and eastern (the Great Barrier Reef; GBR, Queensland and New South Wales; NSW) coastlines of Australia. Multiple tissues were collected from each shark to investigate the effects of location, size and sex of sharks on δ13C and δ15N stable isotopes among these locations. Isotopic composition of sharks sampled in reef and seagrass habitats (Shark Bay, GBR) reflected seagrass-based food-webs, whereas at Ningaloo Reef analysis revealed a dietary … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The δ 34 S values ranged across food webs relying on benthic epiphytes (Moncreiff & Sullivan, ), seagrasses and macroalgae (Belicka et al ., ) and marine particulate organic matter (Benstead et al ., ). By comparison, δ 13 C values of great hammerhead tissues ranged between −13 and −17‰, which are indicative of coastal macrophytes (−14) and pelagic phytoplankton (−18; Hobson, ), but were narrower than those of coastal and estuarine species such as G. cuvier or Carcharhinus leucas (Valenciennes 1839) (Ferreira et al ., ; Matich et al ., ). Great hammerheads occupy a carbon niche breadth similar to that of white sharks (Estrada et al ., ; Kim et al ., ) and a wider range of trophic levels (δ 15 N values) than G. cuvier or C. leucas (Ferreira et al ., ; Matich et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The δ 34 S values ranged across food webs relying on benthic epiphytes (Moncreiff & Sullivan, ), seagrasses and macroalgae (Belicka et al ., ) and marine particulate organic matter (Benstead et al ., ). By comparison, δ 13 C values of great hammerhead tissues ranged between −13 and −17‰, which are indicative of coastal macrophytes (−14) and pelagic phytoplankton (−18; Hobson, ), but were narrower than those of coastal and estuarine species such as G. cuvier or Carcharhinus leucas (Valenciennes 1839) (Ferreira et al ., ; Matich et al ., ). Great hammerheads occupy a carbon niche breadth similar to that of white sharks (Estrada et al ., ; Kim et al ., ) and a wider range of trophic levels (δ 15 N values) than G. cuvier or C. leucas (Ferreira et al ., ; Matich et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…), a consensus has yet to be reached on the preferred pre‐treatment. A number of recently published studies used either no pre‐treatment (e.g …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of recently published studies used either no pre-treatment (e.g. 8,[32][33][34] ), a distilled water rinse followed by a chloroform/methanol 2:1 rinse (e.g. 35 ), or cyclohexane rinses (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations