2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-018-3322-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The trophic ecology of Caribbean reef sharks (Carcharhinus perezi) relative to other large teleost predators on an isolated coral atoll

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This classification resulted in most carcharhinid shark species (e.g., gray reef, blacktip reef, whitetip reef, Caribbean reef) being classified as mesopredators. Recent studies have supported this classification and shown that carcharhinid reef sharks occupy similar trophic levels and isotopic niche space to large-bodied teleost predators (Frisch et al, 2016;Casey et al, 2017;Bond et al, 2018). This seemingly high level of trophic redundancy could explain the limited evidence for shark-induced trophic cascades in most coral reef studies (Frisch et al, 2016;Casey et al, 2017), as these species are likely acting as mesopredators rather than apex predators Roff et al, 2016;Bond et al, 2018).…”
Section: What Are the Trophic Levels And Functional Roles Of Reef Shamentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This classification resulted in most carcharhinid shark species (e.g., gray reef, blacktip reef, whitetip reef, Caribbean reef) being classified as mesopredators. Recent studies have supported this classification and shown that carcharhinid reef sharks occupy similar trophic levels and isotopic niche space to large-bodied teleost predators (Frisch et al, 2016;Casey et al, 2017;Bond et al, 2018). This seemingly high level of trophic redundancy could explain the limited evidence for shark-induced trophic cascades in most coral reef studies (Frisch et al, 2016;Casey et al, 2017), as these species are likely acting as mesopredators rather than apex predators Roff et al, 2016;Bond et al, 2018).…”
Section: What Are the Trophic Levels And Functional Roles Of Reef Shamentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Large bodied mid‐trophic predators included large benthic feeding sharks and green moray eels ( Gymnothorax funebris ), while small bodied mid‐trophic predators encompassed small bodied sharks (<2 m) and spotted moray eels ( Gymnothorax moringa ). Groupings were determined based on relative size and the presumed correlating trophic pressures they placed on the ecosystem (Bond et al, ; LaymanWinemiller, Arrington, & Jepsen, ). Seven common prey families were identified and used to measure habitat risk and risk effects: filefish (family Monacanthidae), grunts (family Haemulidae), jacks (family Carangidae), porgies (family Sparidae), rays (family Dasyatidae & Urotrygonidae), snappers (family Lutjanidae), and triggerfish (family Balistidae).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These habitats provide increased visibility for and detectability of mobile, roving predators. Studies have suggested that in coral reef food webs, reef‐associated sharks and large teleosts occupy similar trophic niches (Bond et al, ; Frisch et al, ; Roff et al, ), which may allow for the detection of generalizable effects of predators on prey or may divert or dilute the nonconsumptive effects of species traditionally considered apex predators on larger prey species. Our knowledge of nonconsumptive effects of marine predators on prey may benefit from examining predator–prey interactions under varying environmental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult C. perezi are known to frequently use deeper water habitats on the reef (Pikitch et al 2005, Chapman et al 2007) and along the reef shelf (Shipley et al 2018, Casselberry et al 2020). Since C. perezi probably does not act as the sole apex predator in many Caribbean coral reef ecosystems (Bond et al 2018), such ontogenetic changes in habitat use allow for avoidance of competition for food with large-bodied teleosts (Heithaus et al 2008, Casselberry et al 2020) and for exploitation of a diverse array of prey items (Bond et al 2018, Shipley et al 2018. Similar ontogenetic habitat shifts were reported for G. cirratum in Florida (Castro 2000), where smaller individuals were frequently found in shallow reefs, under rocks or ledges, whereas larger juveniles and adults were found in deeper reef habitats and rocky areas at depths up to 75 m. However, ontogenetic habitat shifts in G. cirratum are poorly studied, with some evidence to support that individuals occupy deeper parts of the reef with increasing age (Castro 2000, Casselberry et al 2020.…”
Section: Life Stage and Habitat Usementioning
confidence: 99%