Archaeology Under Dictatorship
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-36214-2_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Trojans in Epirus: Archaeology, Myth and Identity in Inter-War Albania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the exclusionist socio-class understanding of the ''people'' in Albania paralleled other types of political folklorism and culturalist projects where specific ethno-religious and ethno-racial categories of the ''people'' were used in support of both chauvinistically and ideologically charged nationalisms and fascisms. The history of archaeological excavations in interwar Albania, for instance, is shown to put emphasis on the ''Romanita´'' connected to the historical myths of Italian fascism (Gilkes, 2004). On the Butrint site where Greek myths locate both Aeneas and Andromache, archaeological findings were aimed at proving the Roman presence, which should legitimate the right of fascist Italy in restoring its authority on the eastern shore of the Adriatic, and finally prepare the annexation of Albania in 1939 (Cabanes, 2004).…”
Section: The National-communist Project Of the Folkloric Traditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the exclusionist socio-class understanding of the ''people'' in Albania paralleled other types of political folklorism and culturalist projects where specific ethno-religious and ethno-racial categories of the ''people'' were used in support of both chauvinistically and ideologically charged nationalisms and fascisms. The history of archaeological excavations in interwar Albania, for instance, is shown to put emphasis on the ''Romanita´'' connected to the historical myths of Italian fascism (Gilkes, 2004). On the Butrint site where Greek myths locate both Aeneas and Andromache, archaeological findings were aimed at proving the Roman presence, which should legitimate the right of fascist Italy in restoring its authority on the eastern shore of the Adriatic, and finally prepare the annexation of Albania in 1939 (Cabanes, 2004).…”
Section: The National-communist Project Of the Folkloric Traditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ɍ ɞɚɧɚɲʃɨʁ Ⱥɥɛɚɧɢʁɢ, ɭ ɫɥɢɱɧɢɦ ɭɫɥɨɜɢɦɚ ɢɡɨɥɨɜɚɧɨɫɬɢ ɢ ɪɨɦɚɧɬɢɱɚɪɫɤɢ ɨɪɢʁɟɧɬɢɫɚɧɟ ɞɢɫɰɢɩɥɢɧɟ, ɪɚɡɜɢʁɚɥɚ ɫɟ ɜɚɪɢʁɚɧɚɬɚ ɤɭɥɬɭɪɧɨɢɫɬɨɪɢʁɫɤɟ ɚɪɯɟɨɥɨɝɢʁɟ, ɭɬɟɦɟʂɟɧɚ, ɬɚɤɨɻɟ, ɧɚ ɧɚɰɢɨɧɚɥɢɫɬɢɱɤɨʁ ɩɪɚɤɫɢ. ɂɞɟʁɚ ɨ ɞɢɪɟɤɬɧɨʁ ɜɟɡɢ ɂɥɢɪɚ ɢ Ⱥɥɛɚɧɚɰɚ, ɯɢɩɨɬɟɡɚ ɤɨʁɚ ɜɭɱɟ ɤɨɪɟɧɟ ɢɡ ɚɭɫɬɪɨɭɝɚɪɫɤɢɯ ɢɫɬɪɚɠɢɜɚʃɚ ɭ XIX ɜɟɤɭ (Wilkes 1992, 5), ɩɨɫɥɟ ɫɬɜɚɪɚʃɚ ɚɥɛɚɧɫɤɟ ɞɪɠɚɜɟ, ɚ ɧɚɪɨɱɢɬɨ ɬɨɤɨɦ ɤɨɦɭɧɢɫɬɢɱɤɟ ɜɥɚɫɬɢ ȿ. ɏɨʇɟ, ɩɨɫɬɚɥɚ ʁɟ ɞɟɨ ɧɚɰɢɨɧɚɥɧɨɝ ɛɢʄɚ ɚɥɛɚɧɫɤɨɝ ɞɪɭɲɬɜɚ (Galaty et al 2004b;Gilkes 2004). ɍ ɬɨɦ ɫɦɢɫɥɭ, ɪɚɧɨɚɧɬɢɱɤɚ ɧɚɫɟʂɚ ɧɚɡɢɜɚʁɭ ɫɟ "ɭɪɛɚɧɨɦ ɢɥɢɪɫɤɨɦ ɮɚɡɨɦ" ɢ ɩɪɟɞɫɬɚɜʂɚʁɭ ɜɚɠɧɭ ɤɚɪɢɤɭ ɭ ɢɫɬɪɚɠɢɜɚʃɭ "ɟɬɧɨɝɟɧɟɡɟ" Ⱥɥɛɚɧɚɰɚ (Ceka 2005).…”
Section: ɉɨɥɢɬɢɱɤɢ ɚɫɩɟɤɬɢ ɟɬɧɢɱɤɨɝ ɞɟɬɟɪɦɢɧɢɡɦɚmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that issued by the Consociazione Turistica Italiana just one year after Italy's incorporation of Albania as a province in 1939 (Anonymous, 1940). The relationship between archaeologists working in Albania and Mussolini's fascist Italy was close (Gilkes, 2004). It thus comes as no surprise that the guide of 1940 was begun on the initiative of Pirro Marconi, director of the Italian archaeological mission in Albania.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%