2020
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2020.610732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Tripartite Regulation Game of Carbon Financial Products Based on the Prospect Theory

Abstract: Because of the high information asymmetry of carbon financial products (CFPs), financial institutions infringing on the rights of investors occurred worldwide. However, few studies focused on how to protect investors effectively. In this paper, from the perspective of regulation, we analyze the game relationships among governments, financial institutions, and investors. Following this, the tripartite regulation game of CFPs is further constructed. Meanwhile, centered on heterogeneity and bounded rationality, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 2021). However, there is a need for devising tough government regulations to protect investor's right, to introduce buyer-driven activities and enhance firm's performance in green innovation, to reduce uncertainty by sustainability indices, to cut green production costs and maintain cooperation among government, consumers, firms and FIs to drive green financial system (Yu et al. , 2020; Awan et al.…”
Section: Discussion and Outcome Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2021). However, there is a need for devising tough government regulations to protect investor's right, to introduce buyer-driven activities and enhance firm's performance in green innovation, to reduce uncertainty by sustainability indices, to cut green production costs and maintain cooperation among government, consumers, firms and FIs to drive green financial system (Yu et al. , 2020; Awan et al.…”
Section: Discussion and Outcome Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xie et al ( 2020 ) introduced carbon quota and carbon emissions trading policies into the dual-channel supply chain model and believed that the government designed incentive measures to regulate the carbon market. Yu et al ( 2020 ) analyzed the game relationship between the government, enterprises, and investors from the perspective of regulation, and believed that governments should engage in low-carbon markets and regulate them through policies. Zhu et al ( 2018 ) and He et al ( 2016 ), based on the efforts of supply chain enterprises to reduce carbon emissions, should guide enterprises to reduce emissions and give priority to subsidies rather than taxes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assumption 2 : Referring to Yu et al (2020) and Meng et al (2021) , the participants in the game are required to share the loss of the liability cost reasonably, and the loss of the liability cost is linearly related (the correlation coefficient is a real number greater than 0). That is, if construction enterprises bear a liability cost loss of C , then the government bears a liability cost loss of kC , where k is the transfer coefficient of the liability cost loss.…”
Section: Construction Safety Supervision Decision-making Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%