2020
DOI: 10.1080/03115518.2020.1730964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Triassic Mesophlebiidae, a little closer to the crown of the Odonata (Insecta) than other ‘triassolestids’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we have tested this premise in an ancient group, well represented in the fossil record, for a topology that had several challenging nodes to recover. We expected the inclusion/exclusion of the debated yTriassolestodes asiaticus (Tierney et al, 2020) to have the greatest effect on the node age estimates due to its placement on an ancient node, crown-Epiprocata, on the Odonata tree. However, we find that removal of this fossil neither changes the recovered ages nor does it affect the precision of ages (Figure S4 and Table S4).…”
Section: Effect Of Fossil Choice and Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Here, we have tested this premise in an ancient group, well represented in the fossil record, for a topology that had several challenging nodes to recover. We expected the inclusion/exclusion of the debated yTriassolestodes asiaticus (Tierney et al, 2020) to have the greatest effect on the node age estimates due to its placement on an ancient node, crown-Epiprocata, on the Odonata tree. However, we find that removal of this fossil neither changes the recovered ages nor does it affect the precision of ages (Figure S4 and Table S4).…”
Section: Effect Of Fossil Choice and Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Divergence times estimation analysis. A recent study (Tierney et al, 2020) suggests that yTriassolestodes asiaticus is perhaps not an appropriate fossil for dating the crown Odonata node (see section ''Updated Kohli et al selection''). Additionally, we also determined that perhaps yProterogomphus renateae is more appropriately placed at the stem Gomphidae node rather than Crown Gomphidae node based on our current taxon sampling (see section ''Updated Kohli et al selection'').…”
Section: Fossil Selection and Divergence Time Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fossil choice and placement have been shown to have an effect on recovered age estimates [13,[22][23][24]. Here, we particularly expected the inclusion/exclusion of the debated †Triassolestodes asiaticus [25] to have the greatest effect on the node age estimates due to its placement on an ancient node, crown-Epiprocata, on the Odonata tree. On the contrary, we find that removal of this fossil neither changes the recovered ages, nor does it affect the precision of ages ( Supplementary Figures S4-1 Table S7).…”
Section: A Note On Dating Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%