1995
DOI: 10.1080/02783199509553677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The triarchic model applied to identifying, teaching, and assessing gifted children1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The STAT was developed as a means of capturing analytical, practical, and creative skills using multiplechoice questions (Sternberg & Clinkenbeard, 1995;Sternberg, Ferrari, Clinkenbeard, & Grigorenko, 1996). Level H of the test (Sternberg, 1993) was designed to measure cognitive skills among secondary school and college students, and was used in this study.…”
Section: The Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test (Stat)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The STAT was developed as a means of capturing analytical, practical, and creative skills using multiplechoice questions (Sternberg & Clinkenbeard, 1995;Sternberg, Ferrari, Clinkenbeard, & Grigorenko, 1996). Level H of the test (Sternberg, 1993) was designed to measure cognitive skills among secondary school and college students, and was used in this study.…”
Section: The Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test (Stat)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Academic skills. In a first set of studies, researchers explored the question of whether conventional education in school systematically discriminates against children with creative and practical strengths (Sternberg and Clinkenbeard, 1995;. Motivating this work was the belief that the systems in most schools strongly tend to favor children with strengths in memory and analytical abilities.…”
Section: All Three Aspects Of Intelligence Togethermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a fi rst set of studies, researchers explored the question of whether conventional education in school systematically discriminates against children with creative and practical strengths (Sternberg and Clinkenbeard 1995 ;Sternberg et al , 1999. Motivating this work was the belief that the systems in most schools strongly tend to favor children with strengths in memory and analytical abilities.…”
Section: Instruction For Successful Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%