The triangle model of responsibility.

Schlenker, Barry R.; Britt, Thomas W.; Pennington, John; Murphy, Rodolfo; Doherty, Kevin E.

doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.632

Cited by 428 publications

(532 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

504

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This phenomenon was investigated through the lens of the Triangle Model of Responsibility (Schlenker et al, 1994). The Triangle Model of Responsibility (TMR) consists of three linkages, and they were used to describe the extent that Project Effort had guided the lives of former participants.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Schlenker et al (1994) explained that for this link to be considered strong, the set of prescriptions have to be applied to an event and should govern conduct. Having a strong link is important because it indicates that Project Effort was influential.…”

Section: Prescription-event Linkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This theoretical model has been used in different scenarios to measure personal responsibility or to predict engagement in certain types of events (Schlenker, 1999;Schlenker et al, 1994;Planas, Kimberlin, Segal, Brushwood, Helper, & Schlenker, 2005). The TMR involves three elements: (a) the event that occurred, (b) the prescription that informs and guide individuals' behaviors in relation to the event, and (c) the identity and personal attributes that are pertinent to the event.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One way to investigate these phenomena is through the lens of the Triangle Model of Responsibility (TMR) (Schlenker, Britt, Pennington, Murphy, & Doherty, 1994). This theoretical model has been used in different scenarios to measure personal responsibility or to predict engagement in certain types of events (Schlenker, 1999;Schlenker et al, 1994;Planas, Kimberlin, Segal, Brushwood, Helper, & Schlenker, 2005).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Life After Project Effort: Appying Values Acquired in a Responsibility-based Physical Activity Program. [Vida después del “Proyecto Esfuerzo”: Aplicación de los valores adquiridos en un programa de actividad física basado en la responsabilidad].

Meléndez

Martinek

2015

Rev. int. cienc. deporte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Prescription-event Linkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Life After Project Effort: Appying Values Acquired in a Responsibility-based Physical Activity Program. [Vida después del “Proyecto Esfuerzo”: Aplicación de los valores adquiridos en un programa de actividad física basado en la responsabilidad].

Meléndez

Martinek

2015

Rev. int. cienc. deporte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…There are two kinds of responsibility in ethics, according to Schlenker et al (1994). The first is 'imputation' or 'self-responsibility,' whereby actors choose to assume responsibility for an intended return, which is basically oriented towards individual benefits.…”

Section: Ambivalent Directionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conceptualizing Heritage Responsibility in World Heritage Sites: Insights from Levinas’ Ethics of Responsibility

Zhang¹

2017

AJTR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The concept of responsibility has always been closely tied to notions of powers and rights. However, current responsibility models such as ' corporate social responsibility' , ' responsible tourism' , and ' destination social responsibility' are limited in their explanations of stakeholders' powers and rights in the heritage tourism context. The current conceptualization of heritage responsibility poses a number of challenges, such as complicated subjects, ambivalent direction, and vague logic. Moreover, engaging with problems such as the asymmetric relationship between responsibility and rights, and the vague relationship between subject and object of responsibility, has been hampered by a lack of sufficient philosophical grounding. The paper addresses this gap by reanalyzing responsibility in the heritage tourism context using Levinas' ethics of responsibility. This study argues the following: a) Heritage responsibility is an ethical responsibility that agents undertake in the process of identifying, interpreting and representing heritage. This type of responsibility points not only to the subject-object ( heritage) level, but also the intersubjective level, and consists of not only responsibility-for-the-self, but also responsibility-for-the-other. b) Heritage responsibility, from the perspective of Levinas' ethics of responsibility, features passivity, infinity, asymmetry, and preoriginariness, which accounts for the unequal distribution of rights and responsibilities in heritage conservation. c) Given these features of heritage responsibility, the discursive power of stakeholders must be recognized in order to ensure that agents with authority assume their share of responsibility. This paper further discusses the relationship between heritage responsibility and self-identity, cultural identity, and discursive power relations, and outlines issues for future research.Keywords: Heritage responsibility; responsibility-for-the-other; heritage tourism 79 Abstract: The concept of responsibility has always been closely tied to notions of powers and rights. However, current responsibility models such as 'corporate social responsibility', 'responsible tourism', and 'destination social responsibility' are limited in their explanations of stakeholders' powers and rights in the heritage tourism context. The current conceptualization of heritage responsibility poses a number of challenges, such as complicated subjects, ambivalent direction, and vague logic. Moreover, engaging with problems such as the asymmetric relationship between responsibility and rights, and the vague relationship between subject and object of responsibility, has been hampered by a lack of sufficient philosophical grounding. The paper addresses this gap by reanalyzing responsibility in the heritage tourism context using Levinas' ethics of responsibility. This study argues the following: a) Heritage responsibility is an ethical responsibility that agents undertake in the process of identifying, interpreting and representing heritage. This ty...

show abstract

Outcome effects: The impact of decision process and outcome controllability

Tan

Lipe

1997

J. Behav. Decis. Making

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An ‘outcome effect’ refers to the phenomenon whereby performance evaluations of decision makers are affected by the outcomes of those decisions. Although some consider such an effect to be a judgmental error, judgment by outcomes may not be dysfunctional when the evaluator does not know how the decision maker chose his or her action. In such situations, outcomes may provide some noisy information about decision quality. We test whether an outcome effect will still occur when the decision methodology and quality are more explicitly identified. Further, we test whether outcome controllability, a previously unexplored moderator variable, will have an impact on the outcome effect. Our first experiment, using undergraduates as subjects, shows that decision quality and controllability have an impact on performance evaluations but that the ubiquitous outcome effect still obtains. These results were replicated with experienced business people, except that controllability only affected their judgments in the case of negative outcomes. Implications of these results are discussed. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

show abstract

The triangle model of responsibility.

Cited by 428 publications

References 49 publications

Life After Project Effort: Appying Values Acquired in a Responsibility-based Physical Activity Program. [Vida después del “Proyecto Esfuerzo”: Aplicación de los valores adquiridos en un programa de actividad física basado en la responsabilidad].

Life After Project Effort: Appying Values Acquired in a Responsibility-based Physical Activity Program. [Vida después del “Proyecto Esfuerzo”: Aplicación de los valores adquiridos en un programa de actividad física basado en la responsabilidad].

Conceptualizing Heritage Responsibility in World Heritage Sites: Insights from Levinas’ Ethics of Responsibility

Outcome effects: The impact of decision process and outcome controllability

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About