2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2009.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The triangle-free process

Abstract: Consider the following stochastic graph process. We begin with G 0 , the empty graph on n vertices, and form G i by adding a randomly chosen edge e i to G i−1 where e i is chosen uniformly at random from the collection of pairs of vertices that neither appear as edges in G i−1 nor form triangles when added as edges to G i−1 . Let the random variable M be the number of edges in the maximal triangle free graph generated by this process. We prove that asymptotically almost surely M = Θ(n 3/2 √ log n). This resolv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
303
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(26 reference statements)
6
303
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum 1-step difference is O(n 1/2 log 5/2 n) (as i < T implies bounds on the co-degrees). Thus the probability of such a large deviation beginning at step j is at most exp −Ω n 2 p(t(j)) 2 (n 2 p(t(j))) · n 1/2 log 5/2 n 2 = exp −Ω np(t(j)) log 5 n .…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The maximum 1-step difference is O(n 1/2 log 5/2 n) (as i < T implies bounds on the co-degrees). Thus the probability of such a large deviation beginning at step j is at most exp −Ω n 2 p(t(j)) 2 (n 2 p(t(j))) · n 1/2 log 5/2 n 2 = exp −Ω np(t(j)) log 5 n .…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To bound the probability of a large deviation we recall a Lemma 6 from [2]. A sequence of random variables X 0 , X 1 , .…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can allow for this in [24], but it is unsatisfactory to ask the reader to check this. We have decided to use an approach suggested in Bohman [4].…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed analysis is subtle, and is based on certain large deviation inequalities. An alternative analysis of this probabilistic construction, inspired by the differential equation method of Wormald [72], is given by Bohman in [17]. It is worth noting that the question of obtaining a super-linear lower bound for r(K 3 , K m ) is mentioned already in [26], and Erdős has established in [28], by an appropriate probabilistic construction, an Ω(m 2 / log 2 m) lower bound.…”
Section: Ramsey Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%