2018
DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2018.1469039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The triad of social sustainability: Defining and measuring social sustainability of urban neighbourhoods

Abstract: Despite recent advances in social sustainability discourse, there is a dearth of working definitions and evaluation frameworks regarding measuring social sustainability of neighbourhoods for research, practice, and policy purposes. Building on the qualitative metaanalysis of relevant resources, this paper proposes the triad of social sustainability consisting of three pillars of neighbourhood, neighbouring, and neighbours, as a conceptual framework for understanding and measuring social sustainability of neigh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of (urban) social sustainability is known as a complex and "wicked" problem [14,33,[58][59][60]. The concept is quite diffuse, with multiple existing definitions, interpretations and characteristics in theory, policy and practice [19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Urban Social Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of (urban) social sustainability is known as a complex and "wicked" problem [14,33,[58][59][60]. The concept is quite diffuse, with multiple existing definitions, interpretations and characteristics in theory, policy and practice [19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Urban Social Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in Table A1, while traditionally the focus of social sustainability studies has been more on the macro scales (city and region), more recently the focus has been shifted towards micro scales (neighbourhood and community) (e.g. Hemani, Das, and Chowdhury 2017;Shirazi and Keivani 2018). Furthermore, there has been a transition from traditional "hard" measures of social sustainability (such as employment and poverty reduction) to more intangible and "soft" measures (such as social participation, and sense of place) (Colantonio 2016).…”
Section: Urban Social Sustainability: Definition and Conceptualisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the issue of urban social sustainability at the neighbourhood scale has received scant treatment in the literature (Hemani, Das, and Chowdhury 2017;Shirazi and Keivani 2018) hence, revealing a pressing need for more empirical investigations on this topic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptual definitions of social sustainability. (McKenzie, 2004) as a positive condition within communities, and a process within communities that can achieve that condition (GressgĂ„rd, 2015) as a way to mobilize people under a future vision (Boström, 2012) as a frame that can assists in discussions about social policies, rather than a concept with a ready-to-use definition (Missimer, RobĂšrt, & Broman, 2016) as the lack of hindrances in society for health, influence, competence, impartiality and meaning-making (Chiu, 2003) as the social conditions necessary to support environmental sustainability (Chiu, 2003) as the maintenance of social structures during activities for social change (Chiu, 2003) as the maintenance and improvement of the well-being of people in this and future generations (Boström, 2012;Bramley et al, 2006;Chiu, 2003;Dempsey et al, 2012;Dixon & Woodcraft, 2013;Eizenberg & Jabareen, 2017;McKenzie, 2004;PolĂšse & Stren, 2000;Rashidfarokhi et al, 2018;Shirazi & Keivani, 2019;Vallance et al, 2009)…”
Section: Social Sustainability: An Ambiguous Concept With Various Dimmentioning
confidence: 99%