2019
DOI: 10.1111/jsch.12210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Trees Are Still Standing: The Backstory of Sierra Club v. Morton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Justice Douglas shared Stone’s concern about the urgency of protecting nature—he was personally committed to nature conservation and had been a member of the Sierra Club (McKeown 2019)—what he was trying to address was primarily a technical issue: the question of the possibility to sue on behalf of a natural element. It was for him a procedural tool, as is the case for ships or corporations which, despite being inanimate objects or abstract entities, have the status of legal persons.…”
Section: The Path Of Habeas Corpusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Justice Douglas shared Stone’s concern about the urgency of protecting nature—he was personally committed to nature conservation and had been a member of the Sierra Club (McKeown 2019)—what he was trying to address was primarily a technical issue: the question of the possibility to sue on behalf of a natural element. It was for him a procedural tool, as is the case for ships or corporations which, despite being inanimate objects or abstract entities, have the status of legal persons.…”
Section: The Path Of Habeas Corpusmentioning
confidence: 99%