2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The treatment performance and nutrient removal of a garden land infiltration system receiving dairy farm wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the level of anion loads, higher removal of NO3 − and H2PO4 − in these closed systems than in the open system may be due to the fact that the more intensive growth of these crops resulted in a higher uptake of N [28] and P [29]. The percentages of nutrient removal in these water systems were lower than in the other systems, such as the soil treatment [30,31] or biofiltration systems [32] where the percentages of nutrient removal were higher than 50%, pointing out that the results obtained in so different environmental conditions are not directly comparable. On the other hand, the high potassium removal could be due to the high nutrient requirements of these crops and the lower removal of Na + , Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ compared to K + could be due to the antagonism between these cations under saline conditions as reported by Marschner [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the level of anion loads, higher removal of NO3 − and H2PO4 − in these closed systems than in the open system may be due to the fact that the more intensive growth of these crops resulted in a higher uptake of N [28] and P [29]. The percentages of nutrient removal in these water systems were lower than in the other systems, such as the soil treatment [30,31] or biofiltration systems [32] where the percentages of nutrient removal were higher than 50%, pointing out that the results obtained in so different environmental conditions are not directly comparable. On the other hand, the high potassium removal could be due to the high nutrient requirements of these crops and the lower removal of Na + , Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ compared to K + could be due to the antagonism between these cations under saline conditions as reported by Marschner [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the removal of NO 3 − is an additional benefit, especially in the Spanish Southeast, since it is an area classified as a nitrate vulnerable zone in accordance with the European Union Directive [31]. The percentages of nutrient removal in these water systems were lower than in the other systems such as the soil treatment [32,33] or the biofiltration systems [34], where the percentages of nutrient removal were higher than 50%, pointing out that the results obtained in such different environmental conditions are not directly comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in most developing countries, especially in rural areas, these technologies are not adaptable, mainly because of expensive construction cost, complex operation, and maintenance . Recently, soil infiltration system has been gaining interests, such as the subsurface wastewater infiltration (SWI) and constructed rapid infiltration (CRI), due to their lower construction and operational costs, lower energy demands, simple management and maintenance, and higher effluent quality . Specifically, the constructed rapid infiltration systems (CRIS), which was developed from traditional rapid infiltration systems (RI), is a cost‐effective and technically appropriate alternative wastewater treatment process .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%