The treatment of flat areas and depressions in automated drainage analysis of raster digital elevation models

Abstract

Abstract:Methods developed to process raster digital elevation models (DEM) automatically in order to delineate and measure the properties of drainage networks and drainage basins are being recognized as potentially valuable tools for the topographic parameterization of hydrological models. All of these methods ultimately rely on some form of overland¯ow simulation to de®ne drainage courses and catchment areas and, therefore, have diculty dealing with closed depressions and¯at areas on digital land surface models. Some fundamental assumptions about the nature of these problem topographic features in DEM are implicit in the various techniques developed to deal with them in automated drainage analysis. The principal assumptions are: (1) that closed depressions and¯at areas are spurious features that arise from data errors and limitations of DEM resolution; (2) that¯ow directions across¯at areas are determined solely by adjacent cells of lower elevation; and (3) that closed depressions are caused exclusively by the underestimation of DEM elevations. It is argued that while the ®rst of these assumptions is reasonable, given the quality of DEMs generally available for hydrological analysis, the others are not. Rather it seems more likely that depressions are caused by both underand overestimation errors and that¯ow directions across¯at areas are determined by the distribution of both higher and lower elevations surrounding¯at areas. Two new algorithms are introduced that are based on more reasonable assumptions about the nature of¯at areas and depressions, and produce more realistic results in application. These algorithms allow breaching of depression outlets and consider the distribution of both higher and lower elevations in assigning¯ow directions on¯at areas. The results of applying these algorithms to some real and hypothetical landscapes are presented. #

Quantifying the performance of automated GIS-based geomorphological approaches for riparian zone delineation using digital elevation models

“…These cells act as sinks to overland flow when deriving a river network using flow direction, and different approaches exist to deal with this issue (e.g. Martz and Garbrecht, 1998;Lindsay and Creed, 2005;Nardi et al, 2008). In this study, we enforced drainage in low relief areas (slope less than 30 %) by lowering two meters the elevation of stream cells in the DEM using GIS data on channel real locations.…”

Prediction of snowmelt derived streamflow in a wetland dominated prairie basin

“…The basin LiDAR DEM was resampled from its original 1-m spatial resolution to 10-m, and a "fill pits" ArcGIS algorithm by Martz and Garbrecht (1998) was used to created a depressionless DEM from the 10-m LiDAR DEM; both were used as inputs in the ArcGIS 3-D spatial analyst "cut/fill". "Cut/fill" detects changes in the area and volume of a surface between two times due to addition or removal of material.…”

Watershed Spatial Discretization for the Analysis of Land Use Change in Coastal Regions

“…In the study area, a 2km buffer was drawn around the watershed borderline. The model was subsequently improved using the DEM Surface Reconditioning System (Hellweger, 1997), which established original drainage lines on the model (Martz and Garbrecht, 1998;Callow et al, 2007). Buffer distances were also designated along the watercourses, in addition to decreases in the river channel, which could be smooth or sharp, shown in Figure 3.…”